<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Marc+M</id>
	<title>Lexical Resource Semantics - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Marc+M"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/Special:Contributions/Marc_M"/>
	<updated>2026-05-23T18:39:36Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3920</id>
		<title>Glossary:Scope Ambiguity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3920"/>
		<updated>2013-03-21T10:50:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: /* Examples */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{MaterialUnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Scope Ambiguity=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/skəʊp æmbigjʊɘti/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Definition==&lt;br /&gt;
Scope ambiguities are closely related to structural ambiguities. Scope ambiguities arise when the scope (scope: an area over which activity, capacity, or influence extends) of a part - or parts - of a sentence is unclear. Quantifiers (words like &#039;every&#039;), negations and adverbial or adjectival modifiers often give rise to scope ambiguites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
1. &#039;&#039;Every man loves a woman.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 1: For every man there is some woman that he loves &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 2: Every man loves the same woman &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
-&amp;gt; The different meanings are determined by which quantifier is given the widest scope. By giving &#039;every&#039; the widest scope, reading 1 arises; by giving &#039;a&#039; the widest scope, reading 2 arises.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. &#039;&#039;All that glitters is not gold.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 1: Everything that glitters is not made of gold; Conclusion: This rock glitters so it cannot be gold &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 2: Not everything that glitters is gold; Conclusion: This rock glitters so it might be gold but it does not have to be. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
-&amp;gt; The different meanings are determined by the scope of the word not. By giving it a narrow scope (&#039;not&#039; only applies to &#039; gold&#039;), reading 1 arises; by giving it a broad scope (&#039;not&#039; applies to &#039;All that glitters is gold&#039;), reading 2 arises.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related terms==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Lexical Ambiguity|Lexical Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Ambiguity|Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Structural Ambiguity|Structural Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*Bieswanger, Markus/Becker, Annette (2008): Introduction to English Linguistics. 2te aktual. Aufl. A Francke Verlag, Tübingen und Basel., p. 155/156.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www2.let.uu.nl/Uil-OTS/Lexicon/|Structural Ambiguity in Utrecht University, Lexicon of Linguistics]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/scope| Thesaurus entry on &#039;scope&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/projects/milca/courses/comsem/html/node92.html| http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/projects/milca/courses/comsem/html/node92.html]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.fallacyfiles.org/scopefal.html| http://www.fallacyfiles.org/scopefal.html]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3919</id>
		<title>Glossary:Scope Ambiguity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3919"/>
		<updated>2013-03-21T10:50:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: /* Definition */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{MaterialUnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Scope Ambiguity=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/skəʊp æmbigjʊɘti/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Definition==&lt;br /&gt;
Scope ambiguities are closely related to structural ambiguities. Scope ambiguities arise when the scope (scope: an area over which activity, capacity, or influence extends) of a part - or parts - of a sentence is unclear. Quantifiers (words like &#039;every&#039;), negations and adverbial or adjectival modifiers often give rise to scope ambiguites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
1. &#039;&#039;Every man loves a woman.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 1: For every man there is some woman that he loves &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 2: Every man loves the same woman &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
-&amp;gt; The different meaningsare determined by which quantifier is given the widest scope. By giving &#039;every&#039; the widest scope, reading 1 arises; by giving &#039;a&#039; the widest scope, reading 2 arises.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. &#039;&#039;All that glitters is not gold.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 1: Everything that glitters is not made of gold; Conclusion: This rock glitters so it cannot be gold &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 2: Not everything that glitters is gold; Conclusion: This rock glitters so it might be gold but it does not have to be. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
-&amp;gt; The different meanings are determined by the scope of the word not. By giving it a narrow scope (&#039;not&#039; only applies to &#039; gold&#039;), reading 1 arises; by giving it a broad scope (&#039;not&#039; applies to &#039;All that glitters is gold&#039;), reading 2 arises.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related terms==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Lexical Ambiguity|Lexical Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Ambiguity|Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Structural Ambiguity|Structural Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*Bieswanger, Markus/Becker, Annette (2008): Introduction to English Linguistics. 2te aktual. Aufl. A Francke Verlag, Tübingen und Basel., p. 155/156.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www2.let.uu.nl/Uil-OTS/Lexicon/|Structural Ambiguity in Utrecht University, Lexicon of Linguistics]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/scope| Thesaurus entry on &#039;scope&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/projects/milca/courses/comsem/html/node92.html| http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/projects/milca/courses/comsem/html/node92.html]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.fallacyfiles.org/scopefal.html| http://www.fallacyfiles.org/scopefal.html]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3918</id>
		<title>Glossary:Scope Ambiguity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3918"/>
		<updated>2013-03-21T10:46:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: /* References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{MaterialUnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Scope Ambiguity=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/skəʊp æmbigjʊɘti/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Definition==&lt;br /&gt;
Scope ambiguities arise when the scope (scope: an area over which activity, capacity, or influence extends) of a part - or parts - of a sentence is unclear. Quantifiers (words like &#039;every&#039;) and negations often give rise to scope ambiguites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
1. &#039;&#039;Every man loves a woman.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 1: For every man there is some woman that he loves &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 2: Every man loves the same woman &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
-&amp;gt; The different meaningsare determined by which quantifier is given the widest scope. By giving &#039;every&#039; the widest scope, reading 1 arises; by giving &#039;a&#039; the widest scope, reading 2 arises.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. &#039;&#039;All that glitters is not gold.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 1: Everything that glitters is not made of gold; Conclusion: This rock glitters so it cannot be gold &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 2: Not everything that glitters is gold; Conclusion: This rock glitters so it might be gold but it does not have to be. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
-&amp;gt; The different meanings are determined by the scope of the word not. By giving it a narrow scope (&#039;not&#039; only applies to &#039; gold&#039;), reading 1 arises; by giving it a broad scope (&#039;not&#039; applies to &#039;All that glitters is gold&#039;), reading 2 arises.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related terms==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Lexical Ambiguity|Lexical Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Ambiguity|Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Structural Ambiguity|Structural Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*Bieswanger, Markus/Becker, Annette (2008): Introduction to English Linguistics. 2te aktual. Aufl. A Francke Verlag, Tübingen und Basel., p. 155/156.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www2.let.uu.nl/Uil-OTS/Lexicon/|Structural Ambiguity in Utrecht University, Lexicon of Linguistics]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/scope| Thesaurus entry on &#039;scope&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/projects/milca/courses/comsem/html/node92.html| http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/projects/milca/courses/comsem/html/node92.html]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.fallacyfiles.org/scopefal.html| http://www.fallacyfiles.org/scopefal.html]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3917</id>
		<title>Glossary:Scope Ambiguity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3917"/>
		<updated>2013-03-21T10:45:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: /* Examples */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{MaterialUnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Scope Ambiguity=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/skəʊp æmbigjʊɘti/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Definition==&lt;br /&gt;
Scope ambiguities arise when the scope (scope: an area over which activity, capacity, or influence extends) of a part - or parts - of a sentence is unclear. Quantifiers (words like &#039;every&#039;) and negations often give rise to scope ambiguites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
1. &#039;&#039;Every man loves a woman.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 1: For every man there is some woman that he loves &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 2: Every man loves the same woman &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
-&amp;gt; The different meaningsare determined by which quantifier is given the widest scope. By giving &#039;every&#039; the widest scope, reading 1 arises; by giving &#039;a&#039; the widest scope, reading 2 arises.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. &#039;&#039;All that glitters is not gold.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 1: Everything that glitters is not made of gold; Conclusion: This rock glitters so it cannot be gold &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 2: Not everything that glitters is gold; Conclusion: This rock glitters so it might be gold but it does not have to be. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
-&amp;gt; The different meanings are determined by the scope of the word not. By giving it a narrow scope (&#039;not&#039; only applies to &#039; gold&#039;), reading 1 arises; by giving it a broad scope (&#039;not&#039; applies to &#039;All that glitters is gold&#039;), reading 2 arises.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related terms==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Lexical Ambiguity|Lexical Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Ambiguity|Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Structural Ambiguity|Structural Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*Bieswanger, Markus/Becker, Annette (2008): Introduction to English Linguistics. 2te aktual. Aufl. A Francke Verlag, Tübingen und Basel., p. 155/156.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www2.let.uu.nl/Uil-OTS/Lexicon/|Structural Ambiguity in Utrecht University, Lexicon of Linguistics]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/scope| Thesaurus entry on &#039;scope&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/projects/milca/courses/comsem/html/node92.html| http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/projects/milca/courses/comsem/html/node92.html]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3916</id>
		<title>Glossary:Scope Ambiguity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3916"/>
		<updated>2013-03-21T10:44:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: /* Examples */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{MaterialUnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Scope Ambiguity=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/skəʊp æmbigjʊɘti/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Definition==&lt;br /&gt;
Scope ambiguities arise when the scope (scope: an area over which activity, capacity, or influence extends) of a part - or parts - of a sentence is unclear. Quantifiers (words like &#039;every&#039;) and negations often give rise to scope ambiguites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
1. &#039;&#039;Every man loves a woman.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 1: For every man there is some woman that he loves&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 2: Every man loves the same woman &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
-&amp;gt; The different meaningsare determined by which quantifier is given the widest scope. By giving &#039;every&#039; the widest scope, reading 1 arises; by giving &#039;a&#039; the widest scope, reading 2 arises.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. &#039;&#039;All that glitters is not gold.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 1: Everything that glitters is not made of gold; Conclusion: This rock glitters so it cannot be gold&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 2: Not everything that glitters is gold; Conclusion: This rock glitters so it might be gold but it does not have to be.&lt;br /&gt;
-&amp;gt; The different meanings are determined by the scope of the word not. By giving it a narrow scope (&#039;not&#039; only applies to &#039; gold&#039;), reading 1 arises; by giving it a broad scope (&#039;not&#039; applies to &#039;All that glitters is gold&#039;), reading 2 arises.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related terms==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Lexical Ambiguity|Lexical Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Ambiguity|Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Structural Ambiguity|Structural Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*Bieswanger, Markus/Becker, Annette (2008): Introduction to English Linguistics. 2te aktual. Aufl. A Francke Verlag, Tübingen und Basel., p. 155/156.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www2.let.uu.nl/Uil-OTS/Lexicon/|Structural Ambiguity in Utrecht University, Lexicon of Linguistics]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/scope| Thesaurus entry on &#039;scope&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/projects/milca/courses/comsem/html/node92.html| http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/projects/milca/courses/comsem/html/node92.html]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3915</id>
		<title>Glossary:Scope Ambiguity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3915"/>
		<updated>2013-03-21T10:44:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: /* Examples */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{MaterialUnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Scope Ambiguity=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/skəʊp æmbigjʊɘti/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Definition==&lt;br /&gt;
Scope ambiguities arise when the scope (scope: an area over which activity, capacity, or influence extends) of a part - or parts - of a sentence is unclear. Quantifiers (words like &#039;every&#039;) and negations often give rise to scope ambiguites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
1. &#039;&#039;Every man loves a woman.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 1: For every man there is some woman that he loves&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 2: Every man loves the same woman &amp;lt;/br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
-&amp;gt; The different meaningsare determined by which quantifier is given the widest scope. By giving &#039;every&#039; the widest scope, reading 1 arises; by giving &#039;a&#039; the widest scope, reading 2 arises.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. &#039;&#039;All that glitters is not gold.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 1: Everything that glitters is not made of gold; Conclusion: This rock glitters so it cannot be gold&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 2: Not everything that glitters is gold; Conclusion: This rock glitters so it might be gold but it does not have to be.&lt;br /&gt;
-&amp;gt; The different meanings are determined by the scope of the word not. By giving it a narrow scope (&#039;not&#039; only applies to &#039; gold&#039;), reading 1 arises; by giving it a broad scope (&#039;not&#039; applies to &#039;All that glitters is gold&#039;), reading 2 arises.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related terms==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Lexical Ambiguity|Lexical Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Ambiguity|Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Structural Ambiguity|Structural Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*Bieswanger, Markus/Becker, Annette (2008): Introduction to English Linguistics. 2te aktual. Aufl. A Francke Verlag, Tübingen und Basel., p. 155/156.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www2.let.uu.nl/Uil-OTS/Lexicon/|Structural Ambiguity in Utrecht University, Lexicon of Linguistics]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/scope| Thesaurus entry on &#039;scope&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/projects/milca/courses/comsem/html/node92.html| http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/projects/milca/courses/comsem/html/node92.html]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3914</id>
		<title>Glossary:Scope Ambiguity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3914"/>
		<updated>2013-03-21T10:44:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: /* Examples */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{MaterialUnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Scope Ambiguity=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/skəʊp æmbigjʊɘti/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Definition==&lt;br /&gt;
Scope ambiguities arise when the scope (scope: an area over which activity, capacity, or influence extends) of a part - or parts - of a sentence is unclear. Quantifiers (words like &#039;every&#039;) and negations often give rise to scope ambiguites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
1. &#039;&#039;Every man loves a woman.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 1: For every man there is some woman that he loves&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 2: Every man loves the same woman&lt;br /&gt;
-&amp;gt; The different meaningsare determined by which quantifier is given the widest scope. By giving &#039;every&#039; the widest scope, reading 1 arises; by giving &#039;a&#039; the widest scope, reading 2 arises.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. &#039;&#039;All that glitters is not gold.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 1: Everything that glitters is not made of gold; Conclusion: This rock glitters so it cannot be gold&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 2: Not everything that glitters is gold; Conclusion: This rock glitters so it might be gold but it does not have to be.&lt;br /&gt;
-&amp;gt; The different meanings are determined by the scope of the word not. By giving it a narrow scope (&#039;not&#039; only applies to &#039; gold&#039;), reading 1 arises; by giving it a broad scope (&#039;not&#039; applies to &#039;All that glitters is gold&#039;), reading 2 arises.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related terms==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Lexical Ambiguity|Lexical Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Ambiguity|Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Structural Ambiguity|Structural Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*Bieswanger, Markus/Becker, Annette (2008): Introduction to English Linguistics. 2te aktual. Aufl. A Francke Verlag, Tübingen und Basel., p. 155/156.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www2.let.uu.nl/Uil-OTS/Lexicon/|Structural Ambiguity in Utrecht University, Lexicon of Linguistics]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/scope| Thesaurus entry on &#039;scope&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/projects/milca/courses/comsem/html/node92.html| http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/projects/milca/courses/comsem/html/node92.html]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3913</id>
		<title>Glossary:Scope Ambiguity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3913"/>
		<updated>2013-03-21T10:28:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: /* Examples */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{MaterialUnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Scope Ambiguity=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/skəʊp æmbigjʊɘti/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Definition==&lt;br /&gt;
Scope ambiguities arise when the scope (scope: an area over which activity, capacity, or influence extends) of a part - or parts - of a sentence is unclear. Quantifiers (words like &#039;every&#039;) and negations often give rise to scope ambiguites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
Every man loves a woman.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 1: For every man there is some woman that he loves&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 2: Every man loves the same woman&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not all that glitters is gold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 1:&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 2:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related terms==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Lexical Ambiguity|Lexical Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Ambiguity|Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Structural Ambiguity|Structural Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*Bieswanger, Markus/Becker, Annette (2008): Introduction to English Linguistics. 2te aktual. Aufl. A Francke Verlag, Tübingen und Basel., p. 155/156.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www2.let.uu.nl/Uil-OTS/Lexicon/|Structural Ambiguity in Utrecht University, Lexicon of Linguistics]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/scope| Thesaurus entry on &#039;scope&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/projects/milca/courses/comsem/html/node92.html| http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/projects/milca/courses/comsem/html/node92.html]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3912</id>
		<title>Glossary:Scope Ambiguity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3912"/>
		<updated>2013-03-21T10:25:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: /* References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{MaterialUnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Scope Ambiguity=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/skəʊp æmbigjʊɘti/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Definition==&lt;br /&gt;
Scope ambiguities arise when the scope (scope: an area over which activity, capacity, or influence extends) of a part - or parts - of a sentence is unclear. Quantifiers (words like &#039;every&#039;) and negations often give rise to scope ambiguites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
Every man loves a woman&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not all that glitters is gold&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related terms==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Lexical Ambiguity|Lexical Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Ambiguity|Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Structural Ambiguity|Structural Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*Bieswanger, Markus/Becker, Annette (2008): Introduction to English Linguistics. 2te aktual. Aufl. A Francke Verlag, Tübingen und Basel., p. 155/156.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www2.let.uu.nl/Uil-OTS/Lexicon/|Structural Ambiguity in Utrecht University, Lexicon of Linguistics]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/scope| Thesaurus entry on &#039;scope&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/projects/milca/courses/comsem/html/node92.html| http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/projects/milca/courses/comsem/html/node92.html]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3911</id>
		<title>Glossary:Scope Ambiguity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3911"/>
		<updated>2013-03-21T10:24:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{MaterialUnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Scope Ambiguity=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/skəʊp æmbigjʊɘti/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Definition==&lt;br /&gt;
Scope ambiguities arise when the scope (scope: an area over which activity, capacity, or influence extends) of a part - or parts - of a sentence is unclear. Quantifiers (words like &#039;every&#039;) and negations often give rise to scope ambiguites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
Every man loves a woman&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not all that glitters is gold&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related terms==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Lexical Ambiguity|Lexical Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Ambiguity|Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Structural Ambiguity|Structural Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*Bieswanger, Markus/Becker, Annette (2008): Introduction to English Linguistics. 2te aktual. Aufl. A Francke Verlag, Tübingen und Basel., p. 155/156.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www2.let.uu.nl/Uil-OTS/Lexicon/|Structural Ambiguity in Utrecht University, Lexicon of Linguistics]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/scope| Thesaurus entry on &#039;scope&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/projects/milca/courses/comsem/html/node92.html|http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/projects/milca/courses/comsem/html/node92.html]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3910</id>
		<title>Glossary:Scope Ambiguity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3910"/>
		<updated>2013-03-21T10:24:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{MaterialUnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Scope Ambiguity=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/skəʊp æmbigjʊɘti/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Definition==&lt;br /&gt;
Scope ambiguities arise when the scope (scope: an area over which activity, capacity, or influence extends) of a part - or parts - of a sentence is unclear. Quantifiers (words like &#039;every&#039;) and negations often give rise to scope ambiguites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
Every man loves a woman&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not all that glitters is gold&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related terms==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Lexical Ambiguity|Lexical Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Ambiguity|Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Structural Ambiguity|Structural Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*Bieswanger, Markus/Becker, Annette (2008): Introduction to English Linguistics. 2te aktual. Aufl. A Francke Verlag, Tübingen und Basel., p. 155/156.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www2.let.uu.nl/Uil-OTS/Lexicon/|Structural Ambiguity in Utrecht University, Lexicon of Linguistics]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/scope| Thesaurus entry on &#039;scope&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/projects/milca/courses/comsem/html/node92.html]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3909</id>
		<title>Glossary:Scope Ambiguity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3909"/>
		<updated>2013-03-21T10:22:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{MaterialUnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Scope Ambiguity=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/skəʊp æmbigjʊɘti/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Definition==&lt;br /&gt;
Scope ambiguities arise when the scope (scope: an area over which activity, capacity, or influence extends) of a part - or parts - of a sentence is unclear. Quantifiers (words like &#039;every&#039;) and negations often give rise to scope ambiguites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
Every man loves a woman&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not all that glitters is gold&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related terms==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Lexical Ambiguity|Lexical Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Ambiguity|Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Structural Ambiguity|Structural Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*Bieswanger, Markus/Becker, Annette (2008): Introduction to English Linguistics. 2te aktual. Aufl. A Francke Verlag, Tübingen und Basel., p. 155/156.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www2.let.uu.nl/Uil-OTS/Lexicon/|Structural Ambiguity in Utrecht University, Lexicon of Linguistics]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/scope| Thesaurus entry on &#039;scope&#039;]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3908</id>
		<title>Glossary:Scope Ambiguity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3908"/>
		<updated>2013-03-21T10:18:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{MaterialUnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Scope Ambiguity=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/ æmbigjʊɘti/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Definition==&lt;br /&gt;
Scope ambiguities arise when the scope (scope: an area over which activity, capacity, or influence extends) of a part - or parts - of a sentence is unclear. Quantifiers (words like &#039;every&#039;) and negations often give rise to scope ambiguites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related terms==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Lexical Ambiguity|Lexical Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Ambiguity|Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Structural Ambiguity|Structural Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*Bieswanger, Markus/Becker, Annette (2008): Introduction to English Linguistics. 2te aktual. Aufl. A Francke Verlag, Tübingen und Basel., p. 155/156.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www2.let.uu.nl/Uil-OTS/Lexicon/|Structural Ambiguity in Utrecht University, Lexicon of Linguistics]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/scope | Thesaurus entry on &#039;scope&#039;]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3907</id>
		<title>Glossary:Scope Ambiguity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3907"/>
		<updated>2013-03-21T10:17:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{MaterialUnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Scope Ambiguity=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/ æmbigjʊɘti/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Definition==&lt;br /&gt;
Scope ambiguities arise when the scope (scope: an area over which activity, capacity, or influence extends) of a part - or parts - of a sentence is unclear. Quantifiers (words like &#039;every&#039;) and negations often give rise to scope ambiguites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related terms==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Lexical Ambiguity|Lexical Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Ambiguity|Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Structural Ambiguity|Structural Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*Bieswanger, Markus/Becker, Annette (2008): Introduction to English Linguistics. 2te aktual. Aufl. A Francke Verlag, Tübingen und Basel., p. 155/156.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www2.let.uu.nl/Uil-OTS/Lexicon/|Structural Ambiguity in Utrecht University, Lexicon of Linguistics]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/scope|Thesaurus entry on &#039;scope&#039;]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3906</id>
		<title>Glossary:Scope Ambiguity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3906"/>
		<updated>2013-03-21T10:15:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: /* Definition */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{MaterialUnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Scope Ambiguity=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/ æmbigjʊɘti/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Definition==&lt;br /&gt;
Scope ambiguities arise when the scope (scope: an area over which activity, capacity, or influence extends) of a part - or parts - of a sentence is unclear. Quantifiers (words like &#039;every&#039;) and negations often give rise to scope ambiguites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related terms==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Lexical Ambiguity|Lexical Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Ambiguity|Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Structural Ambiguity|Structural Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*Bieswanger, Markus/Becker, Annette (2008): Introduction to English Linguistics. 2te aktual. Aufl. A Francke Verlag, Tübingen und Basel., p. 155/156.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www2.let.uu.nl/Uil-OTS/Lexicon/|Structural Ambiguity in Utrecht University, Lexicon of Linguistics]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3905</id>
		<title>Glossary:Scope Ambiguity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3905"/>
		<updated>2013-03-21T10:12:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: /* Definition */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{MaterialUnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Scope Ambiguity=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/ æmbigjʊɘti/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Definition==&lt;br /&gt;
Scope ambiguities arise when the scope of a part - or parts - of a sentence is unclear. Quantifiers (words like &#039;every&#039;) and negations often give rise to scope ambiguites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related terms==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Lexical Ambiguity|Lexical Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Ambiguity|Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Structural Ambiguity|Structural Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*Bieswanger, Markus/Becker, Annette (2008): Introduction to English Linguistics. 2te aktual. Aufl. A Francke Verlag, Tübingen und Basel., p. 155/156.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www2.let.uu.nl/Uil-OTS/Lexicon/|Structural Ambiguity in Utrecht University, Lexicon of Linguistics]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3904</id>
		<title>Glossary:Scope Ambiguity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3904"/>
		<updated>2013-03-21T10:03:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{MaterialUnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Scope Ambiguity=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/ æmbigjʊɘti/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Definition==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related terms==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Lexical Ambiguity|Lexical Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Ambiguity|Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Structural Ambiguity|Structural Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*Bieswanger, Markus/Becker, Annette (2008): Introduction to English Linguistics. 2te aktual. Aufl. A Francke Verlag, Tübingen und Basel., p. 155/156.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www2.let.uu.nl/Uil-OTS/Lexicon/|Structural Ambiguity in Utrecht University, Lexicon of Linguistics]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3903</id>
		<title>Glossary:Scope Ambiguity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary:Scope_Ambiguity&amp;diff=3903"/>
		<updated>2013-03-21T10:02:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: Created page with &amp;quot;{{MaterialUnderConstruction}}  =Structural Ambiguity=  /strʌktʃɘrɘl æmbigjʊɘti/  ==Definition==  Structural ambiguity arises if two or more different syntactic structur...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{MaterialUnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Structural Ambiguity=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/strʌktʃɘrɘl æmbigjʊɘti/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Definition==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Structural ambiguity arises if two or more different syntactic structures can be assigned to one phrase. In other words: One word order can be associated with two or more different meanings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a lot of old men and women around. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 1: There are a lot of men and women around who are all old. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 2: There are a lot of old men and women of any age around. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We need more intelligent administrators&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 1: We need a larger number of intelligent administrators. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Reading 2: We need more administrators who are intelligent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related terms==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Lexical Ambiguity|Lexical Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Glossary:Ambiguity|Ambiguity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*Bieswanger, Markus/Becker, Annette (2008): Introduction to English Linguistics. 2te aktual. Aufl. A Francke Verlag, Tübingen und Basel., p. 155/156.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www2.let.uu.nl/Uil-OTS/Lexicon/|Structural Ambiguity in Utrecht University, Lexicon of Linguistics]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=NMTS-Group1&amp;diff=3171</id>
		<title>NMTS-Group1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=NMTS-Group1&amp;diff=3171"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:52:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: /* Exercise II */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{MaterialUnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Back to the [[NMTS_Meeting_2#Groups|group overview]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Ambiguity (Group 1) =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Overview ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Members ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[User:Nicki| Nicki]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[User:Marc_M| Marc M]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[User:Leo| Leo]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[User:Anna_Böcher| Anna Böcher]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[User:Lorena| Lorena]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Short description of the topic ===&lt;br /&gt;
Ambiguity is an extremely widespread phenomenon on which many puns and jokes are based on.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It can be differentiated between lexical and structural ambiguity. [[Glossary:Lexical_Ambiguity|Lexical ambiguity]] is defined as words having multiple meanings. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Example&#039;&#039;: &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Is life worth living? It depends on the liver. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Glossary:Structural_Ambiguity|Structural ambiguity]] arises when the syntactic structure of a sentence allows more than one meaning. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Example&#039;&#039;: &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
rich women and men: [rich women] and men &#039;&#039;or&#039;&#039; rich [women or men] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Anna saw tourists with binoculars.: Anna saw [tourists with binoculars] &#039;&#039;or&#039;&#039; Anna saw [tourists] with binoculars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A double meaning is created on the lexical or structural level of meaning by: &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Glossary:Polysemy|polysemy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Glossary:Homophony|homophony]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Glossary:Homonym|homonymy]] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References and links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== References ===&lt;br /&gt;
*Bieswanger, Markus &amp;amp; Annette Becker. 2006. &#039;&#039;Introduction to English Linguistics&#039;&#039; (3rd edition). Tübingen and Basel: A. Francke Verlag. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Kortmann, Bernd. 2005. &#039;&#039;English Linguistics: Essentials&#039;&#039;. Berlin: Cornelsen Verlag.&lt;br /&gt;
*Fromkin, Victoria; Rodman, Robert &amp;amp; Hyams, Nina. 2003. &#039;&#039;An Introduction to Language&#039;&#039; (7th edition). Boston: Thomson Heinle.&lt;br /&gt;
*Matthias Bauer, Joachim Knape, Peter Koch, Susanne Winkler (2010): Dimensionen der Ambiguität. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 158, 7-75.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Links ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Ambiguity|ambiguity (definition in Basic Glossary)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Lexical_Ambiguity|lexical ambiguity (definition in Basic Glossary)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Polysemy|polysemy (definition in Basic Glossary)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Homophony|homophony (definition in Basic Glossary)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Homonym|homonymy (definition in Basic Glossary)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www2.let.uu.nl/Uil-OTS/Lexicon/ &amp;quot;ambiguity&amp;quot; in Utrecht Institute of Linguistics, Lexicon of Linguistics ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ambiguity/ &amp;quot;ambiguity&amp;quot; in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://online.sfsu.edu/kbach/ambguity.html Online version of Kent Bach&#039;s entry on &#039;&#039;ambiguity&#039;&#039; in the &#039;&#039;Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy&#039;&#039;.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Our e-learning objects =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Our wikipages ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Antonym|antonym (definition in Basic Glossary)]] &amp;lt;br/ &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:entailment|entailment (definition in Basic Glossary)]] &amp;lt;br/ &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Homograph|homograph (definition in Basic Glossary)]] &amp;lt;br/ &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Register|register (definition in Basic Glossary)]] &amp;lt;br/ &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Structural_Ambiguity|structural ambiguity (definition in Basic Glossary)]] &amp;lt;br/ &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Our podcasts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyyqkS1aofI Podcast on Lexical Ambiguity]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS_Meeting_10]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Our materials for an interactive whiteboard ==&lt;br /&gt;
 List all the files that your group created for the interactive whiteboard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Our pictures ==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:Carlo.jpg|Anna&#039;s cat Carlo&lt;br /&gt;
File:MarcM1.jpg|Marc M&lt;br /&gt;
File:Nicki1.jpg|Nicki&lt;br /&gt;
File:PA080194.jpg|Jellyfishes (Zoo Berlin), Lorena&#039;s picture&lt;br /&gt;
File:Leo.jpeg|Leo&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Our exercises ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Exercise on types of ambiguities. [[Determine_the_type_of_ambiguity|Link to the exercise]] (only one example so far).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Exercise I ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;General definition of ambiguity&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a) What is an ambiguous word?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
1. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-a-1|a word with only one meaning]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-a-2|a polysemous word]] &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-a-3|a homophone word]] &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
b) What is the technical term for words that have more than one meaning?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
1. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-b-1|scope ambiguity]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-b-2|lexical ambiguity]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-b-3|structural ambiguity]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
c) Which word is the ambiguous word in the sentence?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
1. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-c-1|I bought it without any further inquiry.]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-c-2|There is no bank in this town.]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
d) Think of three sentences in which the word “hot” has different meanings.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Group1-Ex1-e-Solution|{{CheckSolution}}]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Exercise II===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Different types of ambiguity&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a) Phrases and sentences as a whole can have more than one meaning. How is this form of ambiguity called?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
1. [[Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-1|Scope Ambiguity]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2. [[Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-2|Lexical Ambiguity]] &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3. [[Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-3|Structural Ambiguity]] &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
b) Which two meanings does the following sentence contain? Paraphrase them.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;We need more intelligent administrators&#039;&#039;.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rarr; [[Group1-Ex2-b-Solutions|Paraphrases]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:red&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Comment: &lt;br /&gt;
1) give a linguistic characterization of the ambiguity. In reading 1 &#039;&#039;more&#039;&#039; is used as the comparative particle, i.e. &#039;&#039;more intelligent&#039;&#039; forms one constituent. In reading 2  &#039;&#039;more&#039;&#039; is used as a determiner, i.e., it combines with the phrase &#039;&#039;intelligent administrators&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
c) Think of an ambiguous phrase or sentence on your own and explain its ambiguity.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rarr; [[Group1-Ex2-e-Solutions|Example]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Exercise III===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Trees&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a) Draw the two different trees of the following paraphrase.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;poor women and men&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rarr; [[Group1-Ex2-c-Solutions|Trees]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
b) Draw the two different trees of the following sentence.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Peter read the book on the Eiffel-Tower&#039;&#039;.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rarr; [[Group1-Ex2-d-Solutions|Trees]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-3&amp;diff=3170</id>
		<title>Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-3&amp;diff=3170"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:52:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Nearly there, your answer is correct but there is another possible solution. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Structural ambiguity deals with ambiguity on the level of syntax.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
e.g.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Old women and men.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
It is unclear to which noun (women and/or men) the adjective old refers, so the sentence could be read in the two following ways:&lt;br /&gt;
*Both women and men are old.&lt;br /&gt;
*Old only refers to the women. Men are not specified&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the Glossary entry on [[Glossary:Structural Ambiguity| Structural Ambiguity]] for more information. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS-Group1#Exercise II| Try to find the other possible solution!]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-3&amp;diff=3169</id>
		<title>Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-3&amp;diff=3169"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:52:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Nearly there, your answer is correct but there is another possible solution. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Structural ambiguity deals with ambiguity on the level of syntax.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
e.g. &amp;quot;Old women and men.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
It is unclear to which noun (women and/or men) the adjective old refers, so the sentence could be read in the two following ways:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Both women and men are old.&lt;br /&gt;
    Old only refers to the women. Men are not specified&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the Glossary entry on Structural Ambiguity for more information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS-Group1#Exercise II| Try to find the other possible solution!]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-1&amp;diff=3168</id>
		<title>Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-1&amp;diff=3168"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:50:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Nearly there: The answer is correct, but there is another possibilty as well &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scope ambiguity deals with the scope of quantifiers (every, some ...) and is a form of structural ambiguity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
e.g.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Everyone loves someone.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The sentence can be read in the two following ways. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Everyone loves the same someone&lt;br /&gt;
*Everyone loves some different person&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the Glossary entry on [[Glossary:Scope Ambiguity| Scope Ambiguity]] for more information. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS-Group1#Exercise II| Try to find the other possible solution!]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-2&amp;diff=3167</id>
		<title>Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-2</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-2&amp;diff=3167"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:48:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Sorry, the answer is not correct. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lexical ambiguity means that the ambiguity arises on the level of the lexeme (word).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
e.g.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I was right next to the &#039;&#039;&#039;bank&#039;&#039;&#039; when I fainted, otherwise I might not have survived.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*The speaker might have fainted on the water next to the bank of a river, so he did not drown.&lt;br /&gt;
*The speaker fainted next to a financial institute, so enough people were there who could help him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the Glossary entry on [[Glossary:lexical ambiguity| Lexical Ambiguity]] for more information. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS-Group1#Exercise II| Try it again, please!]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-2&amp;diff=3166</id>
		<title>Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-2</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-2&amp;diff=3166"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:47:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Sorry, the answer is not correct. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lexical ambiguity means that the ambiguity arises on the level of the lexeme (word).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
e.g.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I was right next to the &#039;&#039;&#039;bank&#039;&#039;&#039; when I fainted, otherwise I might not have survived.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*The speaker might have fainted on the water next to the bank of a river, so he did not drown.&lt;br /&gt;
*The speaker fainted next to a financial institute, so enough people were there who could help him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the Glossary entry on [[Glossary:lexical ambiguity| Lexical Ambiguity]] for more information. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS-Group1#Our_exercises| Try it again, please!]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=NMTS-Group1&amp;diff=3165</id>
		<title>NMTS-Group1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=NMTS-Group1&amp;diff=3165"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:44:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: /* Exercise III */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{MaterialUnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Back to the [[NMTS_Meeting_2#Groups|group overview]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Ambiguity (Group 1) =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Overview ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Members ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[User:Nicki| Nicki]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[User:Marc_M| Marc M]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[User:Leo| Leo]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[User:Anna_Böcher| Anna Böcher]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[User:Lorena| Lorena]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Short description of the topic ===&lt;br /&gt;
Ambiguity is an extremely widespread phenomenon on which many puns and jokes are based on.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It can be differentiated between lexical and structural ambiguity. [[Glossary:Lexical_Ambiguity|Lexical ambiguity]] is defined as words having multiple meanings. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Example&#039;&#039;: &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Is life worth living? It depends on the liver. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Glossary:Structural_Ambiguity|Structural ambiguity]] arises when the syntactic structure of a sentence allows more than one meaning. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Example&#039;&#039;: &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
rich women and men: [rich women] and men &#039;&#039;or&#039;&#039; rich [women or men] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Anna saw tourists with binoculars.: Anna saw [tourists with binoculars] &#039;&#039;or&#039;&#039; Anna saw [tourists] with binoculars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A double meaning is created on the lexical or structural level of meaning by: &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Glossary:Polysemy|polysemy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Glossary:Homophony|homophony]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Glossary:Homonym|homonymy]] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References and links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== References ===&lt;br /&gt;
*Bieswanger, Markus &amp;amp; Annette Becker. 2006. &#039;&#039;Introduction to English Linguistics&#039;&#039; (3rd edition). Tübingen and Basel: A. Francke Verlag. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Kortmann, Bernd. 2005. &#039;&#039;English Linguistics: Essentials&#039;&#039;. Berlin: Cornelsen Verlag.&lt;br /&gt;
*Fromkin, Victoria; Rodman, Robert &amp;amp; Hyams, Nina. 2003. &#039;&#039;An Introduction to Language&#039;&#039; (7th edition). Boston: Thomson Heinle.&lt;br /&gt;
*Matthias Bauer, Joachim Knape, Peter Koch, Susanne Winkler (2010): Dimensionen der Ambiguität. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 158, 7-75.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Links ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Ambiguity|ambiguity (definition in Basic Glossary)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Lexical_Ambiguity|lexical ambiguity (definition in Basic Glossary)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Polysemy|polysemy (definition in Basic Glossary)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Homophony|homophony (definition in Basic Glossary)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Homonym|homonymy (definition in Basic Glossary)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www2.let.uu.nl/Uil-OTS/Lexicon/ &amp;quot;ambiguity&amp;quot; in Utrecht Institute of Linguistics, Lexicon of Linguistics ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ambiguity/ &amp;quot;ambiguity&amp;quot; in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://online.sfsu.edu/kbach/ambguity.html Online version of Kent Bach&#039;s entry on &#039;&#039;ambiguity&#039;&#039; in the &#039;&#039;Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy&#039;&#039;.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Our e-learning objects =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Our wikipages ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Antonym|antonym (definition in Basic Glossary)]] &amp;lt;br/ &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:entailment|entailment (definition in Basic Glossary)]] &amp;lt;br/ &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Homograph|homograph (definition in Basic Glossary)]] &amp;lt;br/ &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Register|register (definition in Basic Glossary)]] &amp;lt;br/ &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Structural_Ambiguity|structural ambiguity (definition in Basic Glossary)]] &amp;lt;br/ &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Our podcasts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyyqkS1aofI Podcast on Lexical Ambiguity]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS_Meeting_10]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Our materials for an interactive whiteboard ==&lt;br /&gt;
 List all the files that your group created for the interactive whiteboard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Our pictures ==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:Carlo.jpg|Anna&#039;s cat Carlo&lt;br /&gt;
File:MarcM1.jpg|Marc M&lt;br /&gt;
File:Nicki1.jpg|Nicki&lt;br /&gt;
File:PA080194.jpg|Jellyfishes (Zoo Berlin), Lorena&#039;s picture&lt;br /&gt;
File:Leo.jpeg|Leo&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Our exercises ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Exercise on types of ambiguities. [[Determine_the_type_of_ambiguity|Link to the exercise]] (only one example so far).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Exercise I ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;General definition of ambiguity&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a) What is an ambiguous word?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
1. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-a-1|a word with only one meaning]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-a-2|a polysemous word]] &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-a-3|a homophone word]] &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
b) What is the technical term for words that have more than one meaning?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
1. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-b-1|scope ambiguity]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-b-2|lexical ambiguity]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-b-3|structural ambiguity]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
c) Which word is the ambiguous word in the sentence?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
1. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-c-1|I bought it without any further inquiry.]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-c-2|There is no bank in this town.]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
d) Think of three sentences in which the word “hot” has different meanings.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Group1-Ex1-e-Solution|{{CheckSolution}}]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Exercise II===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Different types of ambiguity&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a) Phrases and sentences as a whole can have more than one meaning. How is this form of ambiguity called?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
1. [[Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-1|Scope Ambiguity]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2. [[Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-2|Lexical Ambiguity]] &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3. [[Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-3|Structural Ambiguity]] &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:red&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Comment: good that you link to the definitions here. But the question is not very good, because a sentence can be ambiguous because of a scope ambiguity or a lexical ambiguity, not just because of a scope ambiguity. Please reformulate your question.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
b) Which two meanings does the following sentence contain? Paraphrase them.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;We need more intelligent administrators&#039;&#039;.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rarr; [[Group1-Ex2-b-Solutions|Paraphrases]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:red&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Comment: &lt;br /&gt;
1) give a linguistic characterization of the ambiguity. In reading 1 &#039;&#039;more&#039;&#039; is used as the comparative particle, i.e. &#039;&#039;more intelligent&#039;&#039; forms one constituent. In reading 2  &#039;&#039;more&#039;&#039; is used as a determiner, i.e., it combines with the phrase &#039;&#039;intelligent administrators&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
c) Think of an ambiguous phrase or sentence on your own and explain its ambiguity.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rarr; [[Group1-Ex2-e-Solutions|Example]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Exercise III===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Trees&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a) Draw the two different trees of the following paraphrase.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;poor women and men&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rarr; [[Group1-Ex2-c-Solutions|Trees]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
b) Draw the two different trees of the following sentence.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Peter read the book on the Eiffel-Tower&#039;&#039;.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rarr; [[Group1-Ex2-d-Solutions|Trees]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex2-d-Solutions&amp;diff=3164</id>
		<title>Group1-Ex2-d-Solutions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex2-d-Solutions&amp;diff=3164"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:43:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reading 1.png|Reading 1|500px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reading 2.png|Reading 2|500px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Reading 1 indicates that Peter reads the book about the Eiffel tower.&lt;br /&gt;
*Reading 2 indicates that Peter reads the book physically standing on the Eiffel tower. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS-Group1#Exercise III|Back to exercise]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex2-d-Solutions&amp;diff=3163</id>
		<title>Group1-Ex2-d-Solutions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex2-d-Solutions&amp;diff=3163"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:43:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reading 1.png|Reading 1|500px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reading 2.png|Reading 2|500px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Reading 1 indicates that Peter reads the book about the Eiffel tower.&lt;br /&gt;
*Reading 2 indicates that Peter reads the book physically standing on the Eiffel tower. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS-Group1#Exercise II|Back to exercise]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex2-d-Solutions&amp;diff=3162</id>
		<title>Group1-Ex2-d-Solutions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex2-d-Solutions&amp;diff=3162"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:43:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reading 1.png|Reading 1|500px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reading 2.png|Reading 2|500px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Reading 1 indicates that Peter reads the book about the Eiffel tower.&lt;br /&gt;
*Reading 2 indicates that Peter reads the book physically standing on the Eiffel tower.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS-Group1#Our_exercises|Back to exercises]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex2-d-Solutions&amp;diff=3161</id>
		<title>Group1-Ex2-d-Solutions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex2-d-Solutions&amp;diff=3161"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:43:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reading 1.png|Reading 1|500px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reading 2.png|Reading 2|500px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Reading 1 indicates that Peter reads a book about the Eiffel tower.&lt;br /&gt;
*Reading 2 indicates that Peter reads a book physically standing on the Eiffel tower.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS-Group1#Our_exercises|Back to exercises]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=NMTS-Group1&amp;diff=3160</id>
		<title>NMTS-Group1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=NMTS-Group1&amp;diff=3160"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:39:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: /* Exercise II */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{MaterialUnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Back to the [[NMTS_Meeting_2#Groups|group overview]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Ambiguity (Group 1) =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Overview ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Members ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[User:Nicki| Nicki]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[User:Marc_M| Marc M]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[User:Leo| Leo]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[User:Anna_Böcher| Anna Böcher]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[User:Lorena| Lorena]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Short description of the topic ===&lt;br /&gt;
Ambiguity is an extremely widespread phenomenon on which many puns and jokes are based on.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It can be differentiated between lexical and structural ambiguity. [[Glossary:Lexical_Ambiguity|Lexical ambiguity]] is defined as words having multiple meanings. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Example&#039;&#039;: &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Is life worth living? It depends on the liver. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Glossary:Structural_Ambiguity|Structural ambiguity]] arises when the syntactic structure of a sentence allows more than one meaning. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Example&#039;&#039;: &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
rich women and men: [rich women] and men &#039;&#039;or&#039;&#039; rich [women or men] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Anna saw tourists with binoculars.: Anna saw [tourists with binoculars] &#039;&#039;or&#039;&#039; Anna saw [tourists] with binoculars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A double meaning is created on the lexical or structural level of meaning by: &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Glossary:Polysemy|polysemy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Glossary:Homophony|homophony]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Glossary:Homonym|homonymy]] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References and links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== References ===&lt;br /&gt;
*Bieswanger, Markus &amp;amp; Annette Becker. 2006. &#039;&#039;Introduction to English Linguistics&#039;&#039; (3rd edition). Tübingen and Basel: A. Francke Verlag. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Kortmann, Bernd. 2005. &#039;&#039;English Linguistics: Essentials&#039;&#039;. Berlin: Cornelsen Verlag.&lt;br /&gt;
*Fromkin, Victoria; Rodman, Robert &amp;amp; Hyams, Nina. 2003. &#039;&#039;An Introduction to Language&#039;&#039; (7th edition). Boston: Thomson Heinle.&lt;br /&gt;
*Matthias Bauer, Joachim Knape, Peter Koch, Susanne Winkler (2010): Dimensionen der Ambiguität. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 158, 7-75.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Links ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Ambiguity|ambiguity (definition in Basic Glossary)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Lexical_Ambiguity|lexical ambiguity (definition in Basic Glossary)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Polysemy|polysemy (definition in Basic Glossary)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Homophony|homophony (definition in Basic Glossary)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Homonym|homonymy (definition in Basic Glossary)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www2.let.uu.nl/Uil-OTS/Lexicon/ &amp;quot;ambiguity&amp;quot; in Utrecht Institute of Linguistics, Lexicon of Linguistics ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ambiguity/ &amp;quot;ambiguity&amp;quot; in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://online.sfsu.edu/kbach/ambguity.html Online version of Kent Bach&#039;s entry on &#039;&#039;ambiguity&#039;&#039; in the &#039;&#039;Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy&#039;&#039;.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Our e-learning objects =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Our wikipages ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Antonym|antonym (definition in Basic Glossary)]] &amp;lt;br/ &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:entailment|entailment (definition in Basic Glossary)]] &amp;lt;br/ &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Homograph|homograph (definition in Basic Glossary)]] &amp;lt;br/ &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Register|register (definition in Basic Glossary)]] &amp;lt;br/ &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Structural_Ambiguity|structural ambiguity (definition in Basic Glossary)]] &amp;lt;br/ &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Our podcasts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyyqkS1aofI Podcast on Lexical Ambiguity]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS_Meeting_10]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Our materials for an interactive whiteboard ==&lt;br /&gt;
 List all the files that your group created for the interactive whiteboard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Our pictures ==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:Carlo.jpg|Anna&#039;s cat Carlo&lt;br /&gt;
File:MarcM1.jpg|Marc M&lt;br /&gt;
File:Nicki1.jpg|Nicki&lt;br /&gt;
File:PA080194.jpg|Jellyfishes (Zoo Berlin), Lorena&#039;s picture&lt;br /&gt;
File:Leo.jpeg|Leo&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Our exercises ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Exercise on types of ambiguities. [[Determine_the_type_of_ambiguity|Link to the exercise]] (only one example so far).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Exercise I ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;General definition of ambiguity&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a) What is an ambiguous word?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
1. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-a-1|a word with only one meaning]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-a-2|a polysemous word]] &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-a-3|a homophone word]] &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
b) What is the technical term for words that have more than one meaning?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
1. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-b-1|scope ambiguity]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-b-2|lexical ambiguity]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-b-3|structural ambiguity]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
c) Which word is the ambiguous word in the sentence?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
1. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-c-1|I bought it without any further inquiry.]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-c-2|There is no bank in this town.]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
d) Think of three sentences in which the word “hot” has different meanings.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Group1-Ex1-e-Solution|{{CheckSolution}}]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Exercise II===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Different types of ambiguity&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a) Phrases and sentences as a whole can have more than one meaning. How is this form of ambiguity called?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
1. [[Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-1|Scope Ambiguity]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2. [[Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-2|Lexical Ambiguity]] &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3. [[Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-3|Structural Ambiguity]] &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:red&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Comment: good that you link to the definitions here. But the question is not very good, because a sentence can be ambiguous because of a scope ambiguity or a lexical ambiguity, not just because of a scope ambiguity. Please reformulate your question.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
b) Which two meanings does the following sentence contain? Paraphrase them.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;We need more intelligent administrators&#039;&#039;.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rarr; [[Group1-Ex2-b-Solutions|Paraphrases]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:red&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Comment: &lt;br /&gt;
1) give a linguistic characterization of the ambiguity. In reading 1 &#039;&#039;more&#039;&#039; is used as the comparative particle, i.e. &#039;&#039;more intelligent&#039;&#039; forms one constituent. In reading 2  &#039;&#039;more&#039;&#039; is used as a determiner, i.e., it combines with the phrase &#039;&#039;intelligent administrators&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
c) Think of an ambiguous phrase or sentence on your own and explain its ambiguity.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rarr; [[Group1-Ex2-e-Solutions|Example]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Exercise III===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Trees&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a) Draw the two different trees of the following paraphrase.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;poor women and men&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rarr; [[Group1-Ex2-c-Solutions|Trees]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
b) Draw the two different trees of the following sentence.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Peter read the book on the Eiffel-Tower&#039;&#039;.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rarr; [[Group1-Ex2-d-Solutions|Trees]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D06B12&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Comment: maybe in b) you could add an explanation which two readings are possible, like you did in a) &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex2-b-Solutions&amp;diff=3159</id>
		<title>Group1-Ex2-b-Solutions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex2-b-Solutions&amp;diff=3159"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:24:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;We need more intelligent administrators.&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Possibility 1: &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We have enough administrators, but they are not bright enough and need to become more intelligent.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Possibility 2:&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We do not have enough administrators and need more administrators who are intelligent.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS-Group1#Exercise II|Back to the exercise]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=NMTS-Group1&amp;diff=3158</id>
		<title>NMTS-Group1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=NMTS-Group1&amp;diff=3158"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:22:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: /* Exercise I */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{MaterialUnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Back to the [[NMTS_Meeting_2#Groups|group overview]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Ambiguity (Group 1) =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Overview ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Members ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[User:Nicki| Nicki]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[User:Marc_M| Marc M]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[User:Leo| Leo]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[User:Anna_Böcher| Anna Böcher]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[User:Lorena| Lorena]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Short description of the topic ===&lt;br /&gt;
Ambiguity is an extremely widespread phenomenon on which many puns and jokes are based on.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It can be differentiated between lexical and structural ambiguity. [[Glossary:Lexical_Ambiguity|Lexical ambiguity]] is defined as words having multiple meanings. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Example&#039;&#039;: &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Is life worth living? It depends on the liver. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Glossary:Structural_Ambiguity|Structural ambiguity]] arises when the syntactic structure of a sentence allows more than one meaning. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Example&#039;&#039;: &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
rich women and men: [rich women] and men &#039;&#039;or&#039;&#039; rich [women or men] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Anna saw tourists with binoculars.: Anna saw [tourists with binoculars] &#039;&#039;or&#039;&#039; Anna saw [tourists] with binoculars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A double meaning is created on the lexical or structural level of meaning by: &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Glossary:Polysemy|polysemy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Glossary:Homophony|homophony]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Glossary:Homonym|homonymy]] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References and links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== References ===&lt;br /&gt;
*Bieswanger, Markus &amp;amp; Annette Becker. 2006. &#039;&#039;Introduction to English Linguistics&#039;&#039; (3rd edition). Tübingen and Basel: A. Francke Verlag. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Kortmann, Bernd. 2005. &#039;&#039;English Linguistics: Essentials&#039;&#039;. Berlin: Cornelsen Verlag.&lt;br /&gt;
*Fromkin, Victoria; Rodman, Robert &amp;amp; Hyams, Nina. 2003. &#039;&#039;An Introduction to Language&#039;&#039; (7th edition). Boston: Thomson Heinle.&lt;br /&gt;
*Matthias Bauer, Joachim Knape, Peter Koch, Susanne Winkler (2010): Dimensionen der Ambiguität. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 158, 7-75.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Links ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Ambiguity|ambiguity (definition in Basic Glossary)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Lexical_Ambiguity|lexical ambiguity (definition in Basic Glossary)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Polysemy|polysemy (definition in Basic Glossary)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Homophony|homophony (definition in Basic Glossary)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Homonym|homonymy (definition in Basic Glossary)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www2.let.uu.nl/Uil-OTS/Lexicon/ &amp;quot;ambiguity&amp;quot; in Utrecht Institute of Linguistics, Lexicon of Linguistics ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ambiguity/ &amp;quot;ambiguity&amp;quot; in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://online.sfsu.edu/kbach/ambguity.html Online version of Kent Bach&#039;s entry on &#039;&#039;ambiguity&#039;&#039; in the &#039;&#039;Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy&#039;&#039;.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Our e-learning objects =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Our wikipages ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Antonym|antonym (definition in Basic Glossary)]] &amp;lt;br/ &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:entailment|entailment (definition in Basic Glossary)]] &amp;lt;br/ &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Homograph|homograph (definition in Basic Glossary)]] &amp;lt;br/ &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Register|register (definition in Basic Glossary)]] &amp;lt;br/ &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Structural_Ambiguity|structural ambiguity (definition in Basic Glossary)]] &amp;lt;br/ &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Our podcasts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyyqkS1aofI Podcast on Lexical Ambiguity]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS_Meeting_10]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Our materials for an interactive whiteboard ==&lt;br /&gt;
 List all the files that your group created for the interactive whiteboard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Our pictures ==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:Carlo.jpg|Anna&#039;s cat Carlo&lt;br /&gt;
File:MarcM1.jpg|Marc M&lt;br /&gt;
File:Nicki1.jpg|Nicki&lt;br /&gt;
File:PA080194.jpg|Jellyfishes (Zoo Berlin), Lorena&#039;s picture&lt;br /&gt;
File:Leo.jpeg|Leo&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Our exercises ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Exercise on types of ambiguities. [[Determine_the_type_of_ambiguity|Link to the exercise]] (only one example so far).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Exercise I ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;General definition of ambiguity&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a) What is an ambiguous word?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
1. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-a-1|a word with only one meaning]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-a-2|a polysemous word]] &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-a-3|a homophone word]] &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
b) What is the technical term for words that have more than one meaning?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
1. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-b-1|scope ambiguity]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-b-2|lexical ambiguity]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-b-3|structural ambiguity]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
c) Which word is the ambiguous word in the sentence?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
1. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-c-1|I bought it without any further inquiry.]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-c-2|There is no bank in this town.]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
d) Think of three sentences in which the word “hot” has different meanings.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Group1-Ex1-e-Solution|{{CheckSolution}}]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Exercise II===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Different types of ambiguity&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a) Also phrases and whole sentences can have more than more than one meaning. How is this form of ambiguity called?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
1. [[Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-1|Scope Ambiguity]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2. [[Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-2|Lexical Ambiguity]] &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3. [[Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-3|Structural Ambiguity]] &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:red&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Comment: good that you link to the definitions here. But the question is not very good, because a sentence can be ambiguous because of a scope ambiguity or a lexical ambiguity, not just because of a scope ambiguity. Please reformulate your question.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
b) Which two meanings does the following sentence contain? Paraphrase them.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;We need more intelligent administrators&#039;&#039;.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rarr; [[Group1-Ex2-b-Solutions|Paraphrases]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:red&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Comment: &lt;br /&gt;
1) give a linguistic characterization of the ambiguity. In reading 1 &#039;&#039;more&#039;&#039; is used as the comparative particle, i.e. &#039;&#039;more intelligent&#039;&#039; forms one constituent. In reading 2  &#039;&#039;more&#039;&#039; is used as a determiner, i.e., it combines with the phrase &#039;&#039;intelligent administrators&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
c) Think of an ambiguous phrase or sentence on your own and explain its ambiguity.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rarr; [[Group1-Ex2-e-Solutions|Example]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Exercise III===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Trees&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a) Draw the two different trees of the following paraphrase.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;poor women and men&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rarr; [[Group1-Ex2-c-Solutions|Trees]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
b) Draw the two different trees of the following sentence.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Peter read the book on the Eiffel-Tower&#039;&#039;.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rarr; [[Group1-Ex2-d-Solutions|Trees]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D06B12&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Comment: maybe in b) you could add an explanation which two readings are possible, like you did in a) &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-e-Solution&amp;diff=3157</id>
		<title>Group1-Ex1-e-Solution</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-e-Solution&amp;diff=3157"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:21:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Oxford dictionary proposes the following six different solutions (According to the dictionary you used other solutions might be possible)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* This girl is really hot. -&amp;gt; hot = good looking&lt;br /&gt;
* This pepper is really hot. -&amp;gt; hot = extremely spicy&lt;br /&gt;
* This soup is really hot. -&amp;gt; hot = warm&lt;br /&gt;
* That was a really hot debate -&amp;gt; hot = involving much activity &lt;br /&gt;
* Marc is very hot on Hifi. -&amp;gt; hot = very knowledgable, interested in&lt;br /&gt;
* The whole situation was too hot to be handled by us alone -&amp;gt; hot = difficult to deal with&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to check if a word has different meanings you can consult a dictionary. A good address is http://oxforddictionaries.com &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS-Group1#Exercise I| Let&#039;s try some other exercises!]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-e-Solution&amp;diff=3156</id>
		<title>Group1-Ex1-e-Solution</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-e-Solution&amp;diff=3156"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:21:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Oxford dictionary proposes the following six different solutions (According to the dictionary you used other solutions might be possible)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* This girl is really hot. -&amp;gt; hot = good looking&lt;br /&gt;
* This pepper is really hot. -&amp;gt; hot = extremely spicy&lt;br /&gt;
* This soup is really hot. -&amp;gt; hot = warm&lt;br /&gt;
* That was a really hot debate -&amp;gt; hot = involving much activity &lt;br /&gt;
* Marc is very hot on Hifi. -&amp;gt; hot = very knowledgable, interested in&lt;br /&gt;
* The whole situation was too hot to be handled by us alone -&amp;gt; hot = difficult to deal with&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to check if a word has different meanings you can consult a dictionary. A good address is http://oxforddictionaries.com &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS-Group1#Our_exercises| Let&#039;s try some other exercises!]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-e-Solution&amp;diff=3155</id>
		<title>Group1-Ex1-e-Solution</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-e-Solution&amp;diff=3155"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:19:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Oxford dictionary proposes the following six different solutions (According to the dictionary you used other solutions might be possible)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* This girl is really hot. -&amp;gt; hot = good looking&lt;br /&gt;
* This pepper is really hot. -&amp;gt; hot = extremely spicy&lt;br /&gt;
* This soup is really hot. -&amp;gt; hot = warm&lt;br /&gt;
* That was a really hot debate -&amp;gt; hot = involving much activity &lt;br /&gt;
* Marc is very hot on Hifi. -&amp;gt; hot = very knowledgable, interested in&lt;br /&gt;
* The whole situation was too hot to be handled by us alone -&amp;gt; hot = difficult to deal with&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to check if a word has different meanings you can consult a dictionary. A good address is [http://oxforddictionaries.com| http://oxforddictionaries.com] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS-Group1#Our_exercises| Let&#039;s try some other exercises!]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-e-Solution&amp;diff=3154</id>
		<title>Group1-Ex1-e-Solution</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-e-Solution&amp;diff=3154"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:19:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Oxford dictionary proposes the following six different solutions (According to the dictionary you used other solutions might be possible)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* This girl is really hot. -&amp;gt; hot = good looking&lt;br /&gt;
* This pepper is really hot. -&amp;gt; hot = extremely spicy&lt;br /&gt;
* This soup is really hot. -&amp;gt; hot = warm&lt;br /&gt;
* That was a really hot debate -&amp;gt; hot = involving much activity &lt;br /&gt;
* Marc is very hot on Hifi. -&amp;gt; hot = very knowledgable, interested in&lt;br /&gt;
* The whole situation was too hot to be handled by us alone -&amp;gt; hot = difficult to deal with&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to check if a word has different meanings you can consult a dictionary. A good address is [http://oxforddictionaries.com|http://oxforddictionaries.com] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS-Group1#Our_exercises| Let&#039;s try some other exercises!]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-e-Solution&amp;diff=3153</id>
		<title>Group1-Ex1-e-Solution</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-e-Solution&amp;diff=3153"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:18:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Oxford dictionary proposes the following six different solutions (According to the dictionary you used other solutions might be possible)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* This girl is really hot. -&amp;gt; hot = good looking&lt;br /&gt;
* This pepper is really hot. -&amp;gt; hot = extremely spicy&lt;br /&gt;
* This soup is really hot. -&amp;gt; hot = warm&lt;br /&gt;
* That was a really hot debate -&amp;gt; hot = involving much activity &lt;br /&gt;
* Marc is very hot on Hifi. -&amp;gt; hot = very knowledgable, interested in&lt;br /&gt;
* The whole situation was too hot to be handled by us alone -&amp;gt; hot = difficult to deal with&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to check if a word has different meanings you can consult a dictionary. A good address is [http://oxforddictionaries.com|  http://oxforddictionaries.com] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS-Group1#Our_exercises| Let&#039;s try some other exercises!]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-e-Solution&amp;diff=3152</id>
		<title>Group1-Ex1-e-Solution</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-e-Solution&amp;diff=3152"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:18:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Oxford dictionary proposes the following six different solutions (According to the dictionary you used other solutions might be possible)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* This girl is really hot. -&amp;gt; hot = good looking&lt;br /&gt;
* This pepper is really hot. -&amp;gt; hot = extremely spicy&lt;br /&gt;
* This soup is really hot. -&amp;gt; hot = warm&lt;br /&gt;
* That was a really hot debate -&amp;gt; hot = involving much activity &lt;br /&gt;
* Marc is very hot on Hifi. -&amp;gt; hot = very knowledgable, interested in&lt;br /&gt;
* The whole situation was too hot to be handled by us alone -&amp;gt; hot = difficult to deal with&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to check if a word has different meanings you can consult a dictionary. A good address is [[http://oxforddictionaries.com| http://oxforddictionaries.com ]] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS-Group1#Our_exercises| Let&#039;s try some other exercises!]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-e-Solution&amp;diff=3151</id>
		<title>Group1-Ex1-e-Solution</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-e-Solution&amp;diff=3151"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:17:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Oxford dictionary proposes the following six different solutions (According to the dictionary you used other solutions might be possible)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* This girl is really hot. -&amp;gt; hot = good looking&lt;br /&gt;
* This pepper is really hot. -&amp;gt; hot = extremely spicy&lt;br /&gt;
* This soup is really hot. -&amp;gt; hot = warm&lt;br /&gt;
* That was a really hot debate -&amp;gt; hot = involving much activity &lt;br /&gt;
* Marc is very hot on Hifi. -&amp;gt; hot = very knowledgable, interested in&lt;br /&gt;
* The whole situation was too hot to be handled by us alone -&amp;gt; hot = difficult to deal with&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to check if a word has different meanings you can consult a dictionary. A good address is [http://oxforddictionaries.com| http://oxforddictionaries.com ] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS-Group1#Our_exercises| Let&#039;s try some other exercises!]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-e-Solution&amp;diff=3150</id>
		<title>Group1-Ex1-e-Solution</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-e-Solution&amp;diff=3150"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:17:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Oxford dictionary proposes the following six different solutions (According to the dictionary you used other solutions might be possible)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* This girl is really hot. -&amp;gt; hot = good looking&lt;br /&gt;
* This pepper is really hot. -&amp;gt; hot = extremely spicy&lt;br /&gt;
* This soup is really hot. -&amp;gt; hot = warm&lt;br /&gt;
* That was a really hot debate -&amp;gt; hot = involving much activity &lt;br /&gt;
* Marc is very hot on Hifi. -&amp;gt; hot = very knowledgable, interested in&lt;br /&gt;
* The whole situation was too hot to be handled by us alone -&amp;gt; hot = difficult to deal with&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to check if a word has different meanings you can consult a dictionary. A good address is [[http://oxforddictionaries.com| http://oxforddictionaries.com ]] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS-Group1#Our_exercises| Let&#039;s try some other exercises!]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-e-Solution&amp;diff=3149</id>
		<title>Group1-Ex1-e-Solution</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-e-Solution&amp;diff=3149"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:14:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Followingly possible solutions are given. Other forms could be right as well.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
possible sentences:&lt;br /&gt;
* This girl is really hot. -&amp;gt; hot = good looking&lt;br /&gt;
* This pepper is really hot. -&amp;gt; hot = extremely spicy&lt;br /&gt;
* This soup is really hot. -&amp;gt; hot = warm&lt;br /&gt;
* That was a really hot debate -&amp;gt; hot = involving much activity &lt;br /&gt;
* Marc is very hot on Hifi. -&amp;gt; hot = very knowledgable, interested in&lt;br /&gt;
* The whole situation was too hot to be handled by us alone -&amp;gt; hot = difficult to deal with&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to check if a word has different meanings you can consult a dictionary. A good address is [[http://oxforddictionaries.com]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS-Group1#Our_exercises| Let&#039;s try some other exercises!]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=NMTS-Group1&amp;diff=3148</id>
		<title>NMTS-Group1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=NMTS-Group1&amp;diff=3148"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:08:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: /* Exercise I */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{MaterialUnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Back to the [[NMTS_Meeting_2#Groups|group overview]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Ambiguity (Group 1) =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Overview ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Members ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[User:Nicki| Nicki]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[User:Marc_M| Marc M]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[User:Leo| Leo]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[User:Anna_Böcher| Anna Böcher]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[User:Lorena| Lorena]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Short description of the topic ===&lt;br /&gt;
Ambiguity is an extremely widespread phenomenon on which many puns and jokes are based on.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It can be differentiated between lexical and structural ambiguity. [[Glossary:Lexical_Ambiguity|Lexical ambiguity]] is defined as words having multiple meanings. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Example&#039;&#039;: &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Is life worth living? It depends on the liver. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Glossary:Structural_Ambiguity|Structural ambiguity]] arises when the syntactic structure of a sentence allows more than one meaning. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Example&#039;&#039;: &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
rich women and men: [rich women] and men &#039;&#039;or&#039;&#039; rich [women or men] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Anna saw tourists with binoculars.: Anna saw [tourists with binoculars] &#039;&#039;or&#039;&#039; Anna saw [tourists] with binoculars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A double meaning is created on the lexical or structural level of meaning by: &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Glossary:Polysemy|polysemy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Glossary:Homophony|homophony]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Glossary:Homonym|homonymy]] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References and links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== References ===&lt;br /&gt;
*Bieswanger, Markus &amp;amp; Annette Becker. 2006. &#039;&#039;Introduction to English Linguistics&#039;&#039; (3rd edition). Tübingen and Basel: A. Francke Verlag. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Kortmann, Bernd. 2005. &#039;&#039;English Linguistics: Essentials&#039;&#039;. Berlin: Cornelsen Verlag.&lt;br /&gt;
*Fromkin, Victoria; Rodman, Robert &amp;amp; Hyams, Nina. 2003. &#039;&#039;An Introduction to Language&#039;&#039; (7th edition). Boston: Thomson Heinle.&lt;br /&gt;
*Matthias Bauer, Joachim Knape, Peter Koch, Susanne Winkler (2010): Dimensionen der Ambiguität. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 158, 7-75.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Links ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Ambiguity|ambiguity (definition in Basic Glossary)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Lexical_Ambiguity|lexical ambiguity (definition in Basic Glossary)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Polysemy|polysemy (definition in Basic Glossary)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Homophony|homophony (definition in Basic Glossary)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Homonym|homonymy (definition in Basic Glossary)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www2.let.uu.nl/Uil-OTS/Lexicon/ &amp;quot;ambiguity&amp;quot; in Utrecht Institute of Linguistics, Lexicon of Linguistics ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ambiguity/ &amp;quot;ambiguity&amp;quot; in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://online.sfsu.edu/kbach/ambguity.html Online version of Kent Bach&#039;s entry on &#039;&#039;ambiguity&#039;&#039; in the &#039;&#039;Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy&#039;&#039;.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Our e-learning objects =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Our wikipages ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Antonym|antonym (definition in Basic Glossary)]] &amp;lt;br/ &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:entailment|entailment (definition in Basic Glossary)]] &amp;lt;br/ &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Homograph|homograph (definition in Basic Glossary)]] &amp;lt;br/ &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Register|register (definition in Basic Glossary)]] &amp;lt;br/ &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glossary:Structural_Ambiguity|structural ambiguity (definition in Basic Glossary)]] &amp;lt;br/ &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Our podcasts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyyqkS1aofI Podcast on Lexical Ambiguity]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS_Meeting_10]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Our materials for an interactive whiteboard ==&lt;br /&gt;
 List all the files that your group created for the interactive whiteboard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Our pictures ==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:Carlo.jpg|Anna&#039;s cat Carlo&lt;br /&gt;
File:MarcM1.jpg|Marc M&lt;br /&gt;
File:Nicki1.jpg|Nicki&lt;br /&gt;
File:PA080194.jpg|Jellyfishes (Zoo Berlin), Lorena&#039;s picture&lt;br /&gt;
File:Leo.jpeg|Leo&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Our exercises ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Exercise on types of ambiguities. [[Determine_the_type_of_ambiguity|Link to the exercise]] (only one example so far).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Exercise I ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;General definition of ambiguity&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a) What is an ambiguous word?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
1. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-a-1|a word with only one meaning]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-a-2|a polysemous word]] &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-a-3|a homophone word]] &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:red&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Comment: provide more information in the solution!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D06B12&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Additional comment: maybe provide examples for polysemous and homophone words, or link to Glossary entries in the solution&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
b) What is the technical term for words that have more than one meaning?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
1. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-b-1|scope ambiguity]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-b-2|lexical ambiguity]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-b-3|structural ambiguity]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:red&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Comment: provide more information in the solution!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
c) Which word is the ambiguous word in the sentence?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
1. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-c-1|I bought it without any further inquiry.]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2. [[Group1-Ex1-Solution1-c-2|There is no bank in this town.]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:red&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Comment: provide more information in the solution!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
d) Think of three sentences in which the word “hot” has different meanings.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Group1-Ex1-e-Solution|{{CheckSolution}}]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:red&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Comment: you should give more example sentences with other meanings of &#039;&#039;hot&#039;&#039;. Take all readings given in your favorite monolingual dictionary. For example: http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/hot?q=hot&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Exercise II===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Different types of ambiguity&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a) Also phrases and whole sentences can have more than more than one meaning. How is this form of ambiguity called?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
1. [[Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-1|Scope Ambiguity]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2. [[Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-2|Lexical Ambiguity]] &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3. [[Group1-Ex2-Solution-a-3|Structural Ambiguity]] &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:red&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Comment: good that you link to the definitions here. But the question is not very good, because a sentence can be ambiguous because of a scope ambiguity or a lexical ambiguity, not just because of a scope ambiguity. Please reformulate your question.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
b) Which two meanings does the following sentence contain? Paraphrase them.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;We need more intelligent administrators&#039;&#039;.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rarr; [[Group1-Ex2-b-Solutions|Paraphrases]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:red&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Comment: &lt;br /&gt;
1) give a linguistic characterization of the ambiguity. In reading 1 &#039;&#039;more&#039;&#039; is used as the comparative particle, i.e. &#039;&#039;more intelligent&#039;&#039; forms one constituent. In reading 2  &#039;&#039;more&#039;&#039; is used as a determiner, i.e., it combines with the phrase &#039;&#039;intelligent administrators&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
c) Think of an ambiguous phrase or sentence on your own and explain its ambiguity.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rarr; [[Group1-Ex2-e-Solutions|Example]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Exercise III===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Trees&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a) Draw the two different trees of the following paraphrase.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;poor women and men&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rarr; [[Group1-Ex2-c-Solutions|Trees]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
b) Draw the two different trees of the following sentence.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Peter read the book on the Eiffel-Tower&#039;&#039;.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rarr; [[Group1-Ex2-d-Solutions|Trees]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D06B12&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Comment: maybe in b) you could add an explanation which two readings are possible, like you did in a) &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-Solution1-c-2&amp;diff=3147</id>
		<title>Group1-Ex1-Solution1-c-2</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-Solution1-c-2&amp;diff=3147"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:07:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Bank&#039;&#039;&#039; can be understood in two different ways:&lt;br /&gt;
*Bank as something to sit on: &amp;quot;There is not a bank to sit on in this town.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Bank as financial institution: &amp;quot;There is no financial institution in this town.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS-Group1#Exercise I| Back to the exercise]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-Solution1-c-2&amp;diff=3146</id>
		<title>Group1-Ex1-Solution1-c-2</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-Solution1-c-2&amp;diff=3146"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:06:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Bank can be understood in two different ways:&lt;br /&gt;
*Bank as something to sit on: &amp;quot;There is not a bank to sit on in this town.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Bank as financial institution: &amp;quot;There is no financial institution in this town.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS-Group1#Exercise I| Back to the exercise]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-Solution1-c-1&amp;diff=3144</id>
		<title>Group1-Ex1-Solution1-c-1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-Solution1-c-1&amp;diff=3144"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:05:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Bought&#039;&#039;&#039; can be read in at least the two following ways: &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Bought as &amp;quot;purchased&amp;quot;: I purchased it without any further inquiry&lt;br /&gt;
*Bought as &amp;quot;believed&amp;quot;: I believed it without any further inquiry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS-Group1#Exercise I| Back to the exercise]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-Solution1-b-3&amp;diff=3141</id>
		<title>Group1-Ex1-Solution1-b-3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-Solution1-b-3&amp;diff=3141"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:00:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Sorry, the answer is not correct.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Structural ambiguity deals with ambiguity on the level of syntax.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
e.g.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Old women and men.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
It is unclear to which noun (women and/or men) the adjective old refers, so the sentence could be read in the two following ways:&lt;br /&gt;
*Both women and men are old.&lt;br /&gt;
*Old only refers to the women. Men are not specified&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the Glossary entry on [[Glossary:Structural Ambiguity| Structural Ambiguity]] for more information. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS-Group1#Exercise I| Try it again, please!]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-Solution1-b-2&amp;diff=3140</id>
		<title>Group1-Ex1-Solution1-b-2</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-Solution1-b-2&amp;diff=3140"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T15:00:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Very good, that is correct. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lexical ambiguity means that the ambiguity arises on the level of the lexeme (word).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
e.g.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I was right next to the &#039;&#039;&#039;bank&#039;&#039;&#039; when I fainted, otherwise I might not have survived.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*The speaker might have fainted on the water next to the bank of a river, so he did not drown.&lt;br /&gt;
*The speaker fainted next to a financial institute, so enough people were there who could help him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the Glossary entry on [[Glossary:lexical ambiguity| Lexical Ambiguity]] for more information. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS-Group1#Exercise I| Let&#039;s try some other exercises!]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-Solution1-b-1&amp;diff=3138</id>
		<title>Group1-Ex1-Solution1-b-1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-Solution1-b-1&amp;diff=3138"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T14:59:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Sorry, the answer is not correct.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scope ambiguity deals with the scope of quantifiers (every, some ...) and is a form of structural ambiguity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
e.g.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Everyone loves someone.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The sentence can be read in the two following ways. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Everyone loves the same someone&lt;br /&gt;
*Everyone loves some different person&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the Glossary entry on [[Glossary:Scope Ambiguity| Scope Ambiguity]] for more information. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS-Group1#Exercise I| Try it again, please!]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-Solution1-a-3&amp;diff=3137</id>
		<title>Group1-Ex1-Solution1-a-3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-Solution1-a-3&amp;diff=3137"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T14:59:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Very good, that is correct.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A homophone is a form that has two or more distinct meanings, but is pronounced in the same way. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
e.g. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;bank&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*financial institute&lt;br /&gt;
*a device to sit on&lt;br /&gt;
*the side of a river&lt;br /&gt;
See the Glossary entry on [[Glossary:Homophony| Homophony]] for more information &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS-Group1#Exercise I| Let&#039;s try some other exercises!]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-Solution1-a-2&amp;diff=3136</id>
		<title>Group1-Ex1-Solution1-a-2</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexical-resource-semantics.de/wiki/index.php?title=Group1-Ex1-Solution1-a-2&amp;diff=3136"/>
		<updated>2013-02-04T14:59:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marc M: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Sorry, but your answer is not entirely correct.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polysemous means that a sound sequence has two or more different, but &#039;&#039;&#039;semantically related&#039;&#039;&#039; meanings &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
e.g. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Man&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*A human being (vs. animal)&lt;br /&gt;
*A male human being (vs. female)&lt;br /&gt;
*An adult male human being (vs. boy)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the Glossary entry on [[Glossary: Polysemy| Polysemy]] for more information. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NMTS-Group1#Exercise I| Try it again, please!]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marc M</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>