ExCh1 Ambiguity 1a-c: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Example sentence: ''Pat didn't know a guest at the party.'' Sorry, your answer is not correct. This is not a collective/distributive ambiguity. For such an ambiguity to a...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Example sentence: ''Pat didn't know a guest at the party.'' | Example sentence: ''Pat didn't know a guest at the party.'' | ||
Yes, your answer is correct! | |||
This is | This is a scope ambiguity. | ||
The two readings are:<br /> | |||
Reading 1: Not > Some | |||
:: ''Pat knew no guest at the party.'' | |||
:: More formally: ''It is not the case that there was a guest at the party that Pat knew.'' | |||
:: In this reading the negation has scope over the indefinite ''a guest''. | |||
Reading 2: Some > Not | |||
:: ''There was one guest at the party Pat didn't know.''<br /> | |||
:: More formally: ''There was a guest at that party such that it is not the case that Pat knew this guest.'' | |||
:: In this reading the indefinite ''a guest'' has scope over the negation. | |||
Follow the link to get more [[Types of ambiguity|explanations]]. | |||
==== Navigation ==== | ==== Navigation ==== |
Latest revision as of 05:56, 28 September 2012
Example sentence: Pat didn't know a guest at the party.
Yes, your answer is correct!
This is a scope ambiguity.
The two readings are:
Reading 1: Not > Some
- Pat knew no guest at the party.
- More formally: It is not the case that there was a guest at the party that Pat knew.
- In this reading the negation has scope over the indefinite a guest.
Reading 2: Some > Not
- There was one guest at the party Pat didn't know.
- More formally: There was a guest at that party such that it is not the case that Pat knew this guest.
- In this reading the indefinite a guest has scope over the negation.
- There was one guest at the party Pat didn't know.
Follow the link to get more explanations.