My dog Richard: Difference between revisions

From Lexical Resource Semantics
Jump to navigation Jump to search
DaniKe (talk | contribs)
Created page with "Entailment!!! The reason why we have an entailment here is the fact that we have can think of a second sentence that indicates the truth of the sentence you just read. My dog..."
 
DaniKe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
My dog Richard was killed in a car accident (A)
My dog Richard was killed in a car accident (A)
(entails) My dog is dead (B)
(entails) My dog is dead (B)


The consequence of A is B. In order to find out whether you deal with an entailment or a presupposition you may negate the sentence A. If sentence B remains true then you are confronted with a presupposition, if not you most certainly deal with an entailment:
The consequence of A is B. In order to find out whether you deal with an entailment or a presupposition you may negate the sentence A. If sentence B remains true then you are confronted with a presupposition, if not you most certainly deal with an entailment:


My dog Richard was not killed in a car accident (A)
My dog Richard was not killed in a car accident (A)
My dog is dead (B)= WRONG!!!!=> Entailment
My dog is dead (B)= WRONG!!!!=> Entailment

Revision as of 13:39, 21 January 2013

Entailment!!! The reason why we have an entailment here is the fact that we have can think of a second sentence that indicates the truth of the sentence you just read.

My dog Richard was killed in a car accident (A) (entails) My dog is dead (B)


The consequence of A is B. In order to find out whether you deal with an entailment or a presupposition you may negate the sentence A. If sentence B remains true then you are confronted with a presupposition, if not you most certainly deal with an entailment:


My dog Richard was not killed in a car accident (A) My dog is dead (B)= WRONG!!!!=> Entailment