AnswerEX3-b: Difference between revisions

From Lexical Resource Semantics
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Here the interpretation in predicate logic notation:
Here the interpretation in predicate logic notation:


[[dog (walter) Ʌ enjoy-watching-soccer-together (lisa,tom)]] = FALSE <br/>
[[¬daughter-of-someone (tom,paul)v tall(tom)]] = TRUE <br/>


because [[dog (walter)]]= TRUE <br/>
because [[¬daughter-of-someone (tom,paul)]]= TRUE <br/>


::because I(walter)= walter and <walter> is an element of the set I(dog) <br/>
::because I(tom)= tom, I(paul)=paul and <tom, paul> is NOT an element of I(daughter-of-someone) <br/>


but [[enjoy-watching-soccer-together (lisa,tom)]] = FALSE <br/>
and [[tall(tom)]] = FALSE <br/>
 
::because I(tom)= tom and <tom> is NOT an element of the set I(tall). <br/>
 
Disjunction (v): At least one of the atomic formulae has to be true in order for the complex formula to be true.


::because I(lisa)= lisa, I(tom)= tom and <lisa,tom> is NOT an element of the set I(enjoy-watching-soccer-together). <br/>


====Navigation====
====Navigation====


*[[Interpretation_of_formulae_with_connectives|Link to the current exercise]]
*[[Interpretation_of_formulae_with_connectives|Link to the current exercise]]

Revision as of 18:02, 27 January 2013

Here the interpretation in predicate logic notation:

¬daughter-of-someone (tom,paul)v tall(tom) = TRUE

because ¬daughter-of-someone (tom,paul)= TRUE

because I(tom)= tom, I(paul)=paul and <tom, paul> is NOT an element of I(daughter-of-someone)

and tall(tom) = FALSE

because I(tom)= tom and <tom> is NOT an element of the set I(tall).

Disjunction (v): At least one of the atomic formulae has to be true in order for the complex formula to be true.


Navigation