ExCh1 Ambiguity 1a-a: Difference between revisions

From Lexical Resource Semantics
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 6: Line 6:


Of course, you could argue that the name ''Pat'' could either refer to a female person (short for ''Patricia'') or a male person (short for ''Patrick''). In this sense, it would be a lexical ambiguity.
Of course, you could argue that the name ''Pat'' could either refer to a female person (short for ''Patricia'') or a male person (short for ''Patrick''). In this sense, it would be a lexical ambiguity.
However, we are after a different type of ambiguity here.


However, we are after a different type of ambiguity here. Try again or check the [[Types of ambiguity|explanations]] again.
Try again or check the [[Types of ambiguity|explanations]].


==== Navigation ====
==== Navigation ====

Latest revision as of 05:45, 28 September 2012

Example sentence: Pat didn't know a guest at the party.

Sorry, your answer is not correct.

This is not a lexical ambiguity.

Of course, you could argue that the name Pat could either refer to a female person (short for Patricia) or a male person (short for Patrick). In this sense, it would be a lexical ambiguity. However, we are after a different type of ambiguity here.

Try again or check the explanations.

Navigation