ExCh1 Ambiguity 1a-b: Difference between revisions

From Lexical Resource Semantics
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Example sentence: ''Pat didn't know a guest at the party.'' Sorry, your answer is not correct. This is not a lexical ambiguity. Of course, you could argue that the name '...")
 
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Example sentence: ''Pat didn't know a guest at the party.''  
Example sentence: ''Pat didn't know a guest at the party.''  


Sorry, your answer is not correct.
Sorry, your answer is only partially correct.


This is not a lexical ambiguity.  
You might argue that the preposition phrase ''at the party'' could attach to the noun ''guest'', to the verb phrase ''know a guest'', or to the entire sentence. In each case, the truth conditions of the sentence are the same.  


Of course, you could argue that the name ''Pat'' could either refer to a female person (short for ''Patricia'') or a male person (short for ''Patrick''). In this sense, it would be a lexical ambiguity.
There is, however, another type of ambiguity in the sentence which leads to readings with distinct truth conditions. Try to find this ambiguity.


However, we are after a different type of ambiguity here. Try again or check the [[Types of ambiguity|explanations]] again.
For help, check the [[Types of ambiguity|explanations]].


==== Navigation ====
==== Navigation ====

Latest revision as of 06:02, 28 September 2012

Example sentence: Pat didn't know a guest at the party.

Sorry, your answer is only partially correct.

You might argue that the preposition phrase at the party could attach to the noun guest, to the verb phrase know a guest, or to the entire sentence. In each case, the truth conditions of the sentence are the same.

There is, however, another type of ambiguity in the sentence which leads to readings with distinct truth conditions. Try to find this ambiguity.

For help, check the explanations.

Navigation