ExCh1 Ambiguity 1a-b: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Example sentence: ''Pat didn't know a guest at the party.'' Sorry, your answer is not correct. This is not a lexical ambiguity. Of course, you could argue that the name '...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Example sentence: ''Pat didn't know a guest at the party.'' | Example sentence: ''Pat didn't know a guest at the party.'' | ||
Yes, your answer is correct! | |||
This is | This is a structural ambiguity. | ||
The two readings are: | |||
:: (a) ''Pat knew no guest at the party.''<br /> | |||
More formally: ''It is not the case that there was a guest at the party that Pat knew.'' | |||
:: (b) ''There was one guest at the party Pat didn't know.''<br /> | |||
More formally: ''There was a guest at that party such that it is not the case that Pat knew this guest.'' | |||
Follow the link to get more [[Types of ambiguity|explanations]]. | |||
==== Navigation ==== | ==== Navigation ==== |
Revision as of 05:50, 28 September 2012
Example sentence: Pat didn't know a guest at the party.
Yes, your answer is correct!
This is a structural ambiguity.
The two readings are:
- (a) Pat knew no guest at the party.
- (a) Pat knew no guest at the party.
More formally: It is not the case that there was a guest at the party that Pat knew.
- (b) There was one guest at the party Pat didn't know.
- (b) There was one guest at the party Pat didn't know.
More formally: There was a guest at that party such that it is not the case that Pat knew this guest.
Follow the link to get more explanations.