ExCh1 Ambiguity 1a-b: Difference between revisions

From Lexical Resource Semantics
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Example sentence: ''Pat didn't know a guest at the party.'' Sorry, your answer is not correct. This is not a lexical ambiguity. Of course, you could argue that the name '...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Example sentence: ''Pat didn't know a guest at the party.''  
Example sentence: ''Pat didn't know a guest at the party.''  


Sorry, your answer is not correct.
Yes, your answer is correct!


This is not a lexical ambiguity.  
This is a structural ambiguity.  


Of course, you could argue that the name ''Pat'' could either refer to a female person (short for ''Patricia'') or a male person (short for ''Patrick''). In this sense, it would be a lexical ambiguity.
The two readings are:
:: (a) ''Pat knew no guest at the party.''<br />
More formally: ''It is not the case that there was a guest at the party that Pat knew.''
:: (b) ''There was one guest at the party Pat didn't know.''<br />
More formally: ''There was a guest at that party such that it is not the case that Pat knew this guest.''


However, we are after a different type of ambiguity here. Try again or check the [[Types of ambiguity|explanations]] again.
 
Follow the link to get more [[Types of ambiguity|explanations]].


==== Navigation ====
==== Navigation ====

Revision as of 05:50, 28 September 2012

Example sentence: Pat didn't know a guest at the party.

Yes, your answer is correct!

This is a structural ambiguity.

The two readings are:

(a) Pat knew no guest at the party.

More formally: It is not the case that there was a guest at the party that Pat knew.

(b) There was one guest at the party Pat didn't know.

More formally: There was a guest at that party such that it is not the case that Pat knew this guest.


Follow the link to get more explanations.

Navigation