ExCh1 Ambiguity 1a-b: Difference between revisions

From Lexical Resource Semantics
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
Yes, your answer is correct!
Yes, your answer is correct!


This is a structural ambiguity.  
This is a scope ambiguity.  


The two readings are:
The two readings are:<br />
Reading 1: Not > Some
Reading 1: Not > Some
:: (a) ''Pat knew no guest at the party.''
:: ''Pat knew no guest at the party.''
::More formally: ''It is not the case that there was a guest at the party that Pat knew.''
:: More formally: ''It is not the case that there was a guest at the party that Pat knew.''
:: In this reading the negation has scope over the indefinite ''a guest''.


Reading 2: Some > Not
Reading 2: Some > Not
:: (b) ''There was one guest at the party Pat didn't know.''<br />
:: ''There was one guest at the party Pat didn't know.''<br />
:: More formally: ''There was a guest at that party such that it is not the case that Pat knew this guest.''
:: More formally: ''There was a guest at that party such that it is not the case that Pat knew this guest.''
 
:: In this reading the indefinite ''a guest'' has scope over the negation.


Follow the link to get more [[Types of ambiguity|explanations]].
Follow the link to get more [[Types of ambiguity|explanations]].

Revision as of 05:53, 28 September 2012

Example sentence: Pat didn't know a guest at the party.

Yes, your answer is correct!

This is a scope ambiguity.

The two readings are:
Reading 1: Not > Some

Pat knew no guest at the party.
More formally: It is not the case that there was a guest at the party that Pat knew.
In this reading the negation has scope over the indefinite a guest.

Reading 2: Some > Not

There was one guest at the party Pat didn't know.
More formally: There was a guest at that party such that it is not the case that Pat knew this guest.
In this reading the indefinite a guest has scope over the negation.

Follow the link to get more explanations.

Navigation