Example with a quantifier for the ''Jane Eyre'' context: Difference between revisions

From Lexical Resource Semantics
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 45: Line 45:


== 3. Truth of the formula ==
== 3. Truth of the formula ==
For every individual for which the restrictor is true, the scope is true as well. Therefore the entire formula is true in our model.


== 4. Change the model ==
== 4. Change the model ==

Revision as of 21:06, 29 June 2013

Task 6

1. Write down one formula with a quantifier.

2. For each individual in your universe, indicate whether the restrictor and the scope are true for that individual.

3. Given your results from (b), is the formula true in your model?

4. In which way would your model have to be different to make the formula false (or, in case the formula is false: to make it true in your model)?

1. Formula with a quantifier

Corresponding English sentence: Mr Rochester is every women's husband.

Formula: ∀x (woman(x) : husband-of(edward,x))

2. Evaluation of restrictor and scope by individual

U woman(x) husband-of(edward,x)
JaneEyre 1 1
BerthaMason 1 1
MrRochester 0 0
StJohn 0 0

3. Truth of the formula

For every individual for which the restrictor is true, the scope is true as well. Therefore the entire formula is true in our model.

4. Change the model


Back to the assignment sheet for Chapter 2.