Examples for atomic formulae in the context of ''Jane Eyre'': Difference between revisions

From Lexical Resource Semantics
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
Interpretation:
Interpretation:


[[ '''female(edward)''' ]]
{{denL}}'''female(edward)'''{{denR}} = ''1''<br />
iff < I('''edward''') > &isin; I('''female''')<br />
iff ''MrRochester'' &isin; {''JaneEyre, BerthaMason''}.
 
Since this is not the case, {{denL}}'''female(edward)'''{{denR}} = ''0''.


== Second example ==
== Second example ==
Formula: '''husband-of(edward,bertha)'''
Interpretation:
{{denL}}'''husband-of(edward,bertha)'''{{denR}} = ''1''<br />
iff < I('''edward'''), I('''bertha''') > &isin; I('''husband-of''')<br />
iff <''MrRochester'', ''BerthaMason''> &isin; { <''MrRochester,BerthaMason''>, <''MrRochester,JaneEyre''> }.
Since this is the case, {{denL}}'''husband-of(edward,bertha)'''{{denR}} = ''1''.
<hr />
Back to [[Assignmentsheet_Logic_Summer_Term_2013]]

Latest revision as of 21:12, 28 June 2013

Task 3

Write down two atomic formulæ and compute their truth value with respect to your model.

First example

Formula: female(edward)

Interpretation:

[[female(edward)]] = 1
iff < I(edward) > ∈ I(female)
iff MrRochester ∈ {JaneEyre, BerthaMason}.

Since this is not the case, [[female(edward)]] = 0.

Second example

Formula: husband-of(edward,bertha)

Interpretation:

[[husband-of(edward,bertha)]] = 1
iff < I(edward), I(bertha) > ∈ I(husband-of)
iff <MrRochester, BerthaMason> ∈ { <MrRochester,BerthaMason>, <MrRochester,JaneEyre> }.

Since this is the case, [[husband-of(edward,bertha)]] = 1.


Back to Assignmentsheet_Logic_Summer_Term_2013