Exercise-StructuralAmbiguityTrees: Difference between revisions

From Lexical Resource Semantics
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{ContentUnderConstruction}} The following sentences are structurally ambiguous. In each case sketch the syntactic structure that reflects the indicated disambiguated paraphr...")
 
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ContentUnderConstruction}}
{{ContentUnderConstruction}}


The following sentences are structurally ambiguous. In each case sketch the syntactic structure that reflects the indicated disambiguated paraphrase. You can verify your solution by clicking on <div style="color=green">check your solution</div>.
The following sentences are structurally ambiguous. In each case sketch the syntactic structure that reflects the indicated disambiguated paraphrase. You can verify your solution by clicking on {{CheckSolution}}.


(1) Pat likes good wine and cheese.
(1) Pat likes good wine and cheese.


Reading 1: Pat likes good wine and Pat likes cheese. [[Ex-StructuralAmbiguityTree-1a|Ex-StructuralAmbiguityTree-1a]]
Reading 1: Pat likes good wine and Pat likes cheese. [[Ex-StructuralAmbiguityTree-1a| {{CheckSolution}}]]


Reading 2: Pat likes good wine and Pat likes good cheese.
Reading 2: Pat likes good wine and Pat likes good cheese. [[Ex-StructuralAmbiguityTree-1a| {{CheckSolution}}]]
 
<hr />
[[NMTS_Meeting_11|Back to the meeting of January 15]]

Latest revision as of 03:33, 15 January 2013

Template:ContentUnderConstruction

The following sentences are structurally ambiguous. In each case sketch the syntactic structure that reflects the indicated disambiguated paraphrase. You can verify your solution by clicking on Check your solution!.

(1) Pat likes good wine and cheese.

Reading 1: Pat likes good wine and Pat likes cheese. Check your solution!

Reading 2: Pat likes good wine and Pat likes good cheese. Check your solution!


Back to the meeting of January 15