Group1-Ex1-Solution1-b-2: Difference between revisions

From Lexical Resource Semantics
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 8: Line 8:
*The speaker fainted next to a financial institute, so enough people were there who could help him.
*The speaker fainted next to a financial institute, so enough people were there who could help him.


See the Glossary entry on [[Glossary:lexical ambiguity| Lexical Ambiguity]] for more information. <br/>
See the Glossary entry on [[Glossary:Lexical_Ambiguity|Lexical Ambiguity]] for more information. <br/>


[[NMTS-Group1#Exercise I| Let's try some other exercises!]]
[[NMTS-Group1#Exercise I| Let's try some other exercises!]]

Latest revision as of 16:54, 14 February 2013

Very good, that is correct.

Lexical ambiguity means that the ambiguity arises on the level of the lexeme (word).

e.g. "I was right next to the bank when I fainted, otherwise I might not have survived."

  • The speaker might have fainted on the water next to the bank of a river, so he did not drown.
  • The speaker fainted next to a financial institute, so enough people were there who could help him.

See the Glossary entry on Lexical Ambiguity for more information.

Let's try some other exercises!