Hauptseminar, WiSe 2016/17, Syntax-semantics Interface: Difference between revisions
(→Slides) |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
* semantic concord phenomena (as in substandard "nobody ain't doin' nothing") | * semantic concord phenomena (as in substandard "nobody ain't doin' nothing") | ||
* pragmatic effects on sentence interpretation | * pragmatic effects on sentence interpretation | ||
= For meeting 4 = | |||
== Homework 4 == | |||
* Give the syntactic structure and the logical form of the following sentence. | |||
* Provide the semantic translation for the words in the sentences. | |||
* Provide the semantic translation of all nodes in the trees for the sentences. | |||
Sentences: | |||
:: (i) Chris partied. | |||
:: (ii) Chris invited Alex. | |||
:: (iii) Chris invited Alex and Chris partied. | |||
:: (iv) Chris didn't invite Pat.<br />For (iv): treat ''didn't'' as a single lexical item. Your resulting expression should be &lnot;'''invite2'''('''chris''','''pat'''). | |||
== Video == | |||
= For meeting 3 = | = For meeting 3 = | ||
| Line 28: | Line 44: | ||
== Slides == | == Slides == | ||
Slides: [[File:WS1617-Interface-slides03-final.pdf]] | |||
== Video 1: Model == | == Video 1: Model == | ||
Revision as of 09:03, 2 November 2016
General information
Coordinates
Time: Wednesday, 8.15-9.15 am
Room: New! IG 3.201
Olat course: https://olat-ce.server.uni-frankfurt.de/olat/auth/RepositoryEntry/4208361500
Summary
The syntax-semantics interface is concerned with the relation, the form and the meaning of a sentence. A central observation is that, usually, the meaning of a sentence is predictable on the basis of the meaning of the words used in the sentence and the way in which they are combined. In this course we will explore ways to make this general idea more precise. We will see how these approaches cover general phenomena, but we will also look at a range of phenomena that are challenges to this general observation and see how various approaches attempt to handle them.
The phenomena to look at may include:
- linking (the association of syntactic arguments with semantic argument slots)
- the interpretation of quantified expressions (such as "every book")
- semantic concord phenomena (as in substandard "nobody ain't doin' nothing")
- pragmatic effects on sentence interpretation
For meeting 4
Homework 4
- Give the syntactic structure and the logical form of the following sentence.
- Provide the semantic translation for the words in the sentences.
- Provide the semantic translation of all nodes in the trees for the sentences.
Sentences:
- (i) Chris partied.
- (ii) Chris invited Alex.
- (iii) Chris invited Alex and Chris partied.
- (iv) Chris didn't invite Pat.
For (iv): treat didn't as a single lexical item. Your resulting expression should be &lnot;invite2(chris,pat).
Video
For meeting 3
Homework
- Read Chapter 2, Sections of Levine et al. (in prep.) (available on olat as lrs-vol1-161020.pdf)
- Watch the videos below
- Provide one true and two false atomic formula with respect to the model from our class meeting and provide a step-by-step computation of the truth values of these three formulae.
Slides
Slides: File:WS1617-Interface-slides03-final.pdf
Video 1: Model
Video 2: Truth conditions for atomic formulae
For meeting 2
- Work on the semantics assignment sheet: File:Exercises-predicatelogic.pdf
- Slides from meeting 1:
- course requirement etc: File:Interface-slides01.pdf
- predicate logic tutorial: File:Interface-slides01-predicatelogic.pdf