Parseme MWE Template: General Comments: Difference between revisions

From Lexical Resource Semantics
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
Line 12: Line 12:
** for predicative MWEs: if compatible with all/most predicative constructions (including verbless constructions such as small clauses, absolute ''with''-construction, ...), then no verb is included, but the MWE is marked for predicativeness
** for predicative MWEs: if compatible with all/most predicative constructions (including verbless constructions such as small clauses, absolute ''with''-construction, ...), then no verb is included, but the MWE is marked for predicativeness
** for negative polarity-MWEs: if the negation in not part of the MWE as a fixed lexical element, the negative marker is not lexically included in the MWE, but its NPI-hood is marked (ideally as strong or weak)
** for negative polarity-MWEs: if the negation in not part of the MWE as a fixed lexical element, the negative marker is not lexically included in the MWE, but its NPI-hood is marked (ideally as strong or weak)
** for cases where a the variation is less abstract but nonetheless covers all elements of a lexical semantic class, this class can be listed with its most salient representatives (''keep/start/get/have/set/... the ball rolling'', [[Parseme_References|Nunberg et al. 1994]], p. 504).  
** for cases where a the variation is less abstract but nonetheless covers all elements of a lexical semantic class, this class should be named together with its most salient representatives (''keep/start/get/have/set/... the ball rolling'', [[Parseme_References|Nunberg et al. 1994]], p. 504).
** for cases where the variation is restricted to a small arbitrary number of lexical items, these should be listed (''lose one's mind/marbles'', ''drop a bomb/bombshell/brick'', [[Parseme_References|Nunberg et al. 1994]], p. 504).  
<hr />
<hr />
Back to the [[Parseme_WG1| WG1 page]].
Back to the [[Parseme_WG1| WG1 page]].

Latest revision as of 23:18, 5 March 2014

General Principles

  • Naturally occurring examples are given preference to created examples.
  • Examples are marked as to whether they are created or natural.
  • Basis of the classification: Sag et al. 2002 and Baldwin and Kim 2010:
    • Fixed MWEs: no flexibility allowed whatsoever.
    • Semi-fixed MWEs: only meaningless, obligatory variation allowed.
    • Flexible MWEs: variation allowed that indicates that part of the MWE should be assigned meaning.
  • For each MWE, for each constituent inside this MWE: apply tests for its degree of flexibility
  • Criteria to determine the size of a MWE:
    • lexically obligatory material is included
    • for predicative MWEs: if compatible with all/most predicative constructions (including verbless constructions such as small clauses, absolute with-construction, ...), then no verb is included, but the MWE is marked for predicativeness
    • for negative polarity-MWEs: if the negation in not part of the MWE as a fixed lexical element, the negative marker is not lexically included in the MWE, but its NPI-hood is marked (ideally as strong or weak)
    • for cases where a the variation is less abstract but nonetheless covers all elements of a lexical semantic class, this class should be named together with its most salient representatives (keep/start/get/have/set/... the ball rolling, Nunberg et al. 1994, p. 504).
    • for cases where the variation is restricted to a small arbitrary number of lexical items, these should be listed (lose one's mind/marbles, drop a bomb/bombshell/brick, Nunberg et al. 1994, p. 504).

Back to the WG1 page.