Semantics1 Week 2: Difference between revisions

From Lexical Resource Semantics
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 54: Line 54:
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>


== Why it is too difficult to go directly from language to the world ==
== Why it is too difficult to go directly from language to the world ==
Line 62: Line 63:
# ... is mapped to some expression from a formal language (here: predicate logic): '''like'''('''rob''','''john''')
# ... is mapped to some expression from a formal language (here: predicate logic): '''like'''('''rob''','''john''')
# This logical expression is then interpreted with respect to our scenario/world: The formula '''like'''('''rob''','''john''') is true, because, in our scenario, Rob likes John.
# This logical expression is then interpreted with respect to our scenario/world: The formula '''like'''('''rob''','''john''') is true, because, in our scenario, Rob likes John.
The following properties of natural language make it useful to use the intermediate step of a logical language:
# The same expression can have different meanings (ambiguity).
# Different expressions can have the same meaning (synonyms, paraphrases)
Find examples for the above-mentioned properties (ambiguity, synonymy, paraphrases).


= What we need in a formal model =  
= What we need in a formal model =  

Revision as of 23:32, 21 April 2015

Additional material for the meeting of week 2, April 22, 2015.

Our literary scenario: Game of Thrones (TV series)

Our scenario and some preliminary thoughts

Getting into our literary scenario

Watch the trailer of Season 1 of Game of Thrones:

<mediaplayer>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YinJaXzgzqI</mediaplayer>


Having watched the video, which of the following statements are true in our scenario?

Click on those statements that are true in our scenario.

John Snow is Ned Stark's son.
Catelyn wants that her husband becomes the king's Hand.
Catelyn wants her husband to become the Hand of the king.
There is a king.
There is no king.


The meanings of some of these sentences are unrelated. What do you observe for the following sentence pairs?

Catelyn wants that her husband becomes the king's Hand. and Catelyn wants her husband to become the Hand of the king.

Check your answers

The two sentences are paraphrases of each other, i.e., in every situation, whever the first is true, so is the second.

There is a king. and There is no king.

Check your answers

The two sentences contradict each other. Whenever one is true, the other must be false.


Catelyn wants that her husband becomes the king's Hand. and There is a king.

Check your answers

Whoever utters the first sentence must also assume the truth of the second. (Technically, the second sentence is presupposed by the first, but this doesn't matter here.)


Why it is too difficult to go directly from language to the world

The following architecture is extremely useful when talking about semantics:

  1. A natural language expressions: Rob likes John.
  2. ... is mapped to some expression from a formal language (here: predicate logic): like(rob,john)
  3. This logical expression is then interpreted with respect to our scenario/world: The formula like(rob,john) is true, because, in our scenario, Rob likes John.


The following properties of natural language make it useful to use the intermediate step of a logical language:

  1. The same expression can have different meanings (ambiguity).
  2. Different expressions can have the same meaning (synonyms, paraphrases)

Find examples for the above-mentioned properties (ambiguity, synonymy, paraphrases).

What we need in a formal model

<mediaplayer>http://youtu.be/4a3mXelw7H4</mediaplayer>


For next week