Semantics 1, SoSe 2014: Difference between revisions

From Lexical Resource Semantics
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Replaced content with "Material for the seminar ''Semantics 1'', summer term 2014, Goethe University, Frankfurt a.M. * Mock exam with solutions * [[Semanti...")
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Material for the seminar ''Semantics 1'', summer term 2014, Goethe University, Frankfurt a.M.
Material for the seminar ''Semantics 1'', summer term 2014, Goethe University, Frankfurt a.M.


Mock exam file: [[File:mock-exam-sose14.pdf]]
* [[Semantics 1, SoSe 2014: Mock exam|Mock exam with solutions]]
 
* [[Semantics 1, SoSe 2014: Wiki-based term papers|Wiki-based term papers]]
The examples in the text are based on Shakespeare's play ''Macbeth''. The full text of the play is available on [http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/2264 Projekt Gutenberg].
 
=== Task 1: Ambiguity ===
 
Consider the following ambiguous sentences.
# For '''each''' of these, determine the type of ambiguity.
# Provide an unambiguous paraphrase for the possible readings.
 
(1)
a. Duncan trusted Macbeth because he was a thane.
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="width:800px">
Check your answer
<div class="mw-collapsible-content">
# Type of ambiguity: referential ambiguity
# Reading 1: ''he'' refers to ''Macbeth''. Paraphrase: ''Duncan trusted Macbeth because Macbeth was a thane.''<br />Reading 2: ''he'' refers to ''Duncan''. Paraphrase: ''Duncan trusted Macbeth because Duncan was a thane.''
</div></div>
 
b. Every king trusts a thane.
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="width:800px">
Check your answer
<div class="mw-collapsible-content">
# Type of ambiguity: scope ambiguity
# Reading 1: ''every'' takes scope over ''a''. Paraphrase: ''For every king there is at least one thane such that the king trusts that thane.''<br />Reading 2: ''a'' takes scope over ''every''. Paraphrase: ''There is one particular thane such that each king trusts this thane.''
</div></div>
 
b. Macbeth and Macduff are married.
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="width:800px">
Check your answer
<div class="mw-collapsible-content">
# Type of ambiguity: collective-distributive ambiguity
# Reading 1: collective reading. Paraphrase: ''Macbeth and Macduff are married to each other''<br />Reading 2: distributive reading. Paraphrase: ''Macbeth and Macduff are both married, but not to each other.''
</div></div>
 
b. Macbeth killed a king with a dagger.
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="width:800px">
Check your answer
<div class="mw-collapsible-content">
# Type of ambiguity: structural ambiguity
# Reading 1: the PP ''with a dagger'' is a modifier of the verb ''kill'' Paraphrase: ''Macbeth used a dagger to kill a king.''<br />Reading 2: the PP ''with a dagger'' is a modifier of the noun ''king''. Paraphrase: ''Macbeth killed a king who had a dagger.''
</div></div>
 
 
=== Task 2: Model and Interpretation ===
 
(Note: For this task you do not need to use the functional notation
and the types)
 
1. Define a universe that consists of Macbeth and Banquo.
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="width:800px">
Check your answer
<div class="mw-collapsible-content">
''U'' = { ''Macbeth'', ''Banquo'' }
</div></div>
 
2. Define the interpretation of the names '''macbeth''' and '''banquo''' in an intuitively plausible way.
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="width:800px">
Check your answer
<div class="mw-collapsible-content">
I('''macbeth''') = ''Macbeth'', <br /> I('''banquo''') = ''Banquo''
</div></div>
 
3. Define the interpretation of the properties '''thane''', '''king''',
and '''witch''' is such a way that Macbeth is a
  king,  both are thanes and neither is a witch.
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="width:800px">
Check your answer
<div class="mw-collapsible-content">
I('''thane''') = {''Macbeth'', ''Banquo''},<br /> I('''king''') = {''Macbeth''},<br /> I('''witch''') = {}
</div></div>
 
4. Define the interpretation of the 2-place relations
  \co{mistrust} and \co{kill} in such a way that Macbeth and

Latest revision as of 07:42, 4 July 2014

Material for the seminar Semantics 1, summer term 2014, Goethe University, Frankfurt a.M.