SolutionsGroup5: Difference between revisions

From Lexical Resource Semantics
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
On this page, you can find the solutions to the excercises on Quantifiers.
On this page, you can find the solutions to the excercises on Quantifiers.




Line 10: Line 11:


[[NMTS-Group5#Restricted_Quantifiers|Return to Excercise]]
[[NMTS-Group5#Restricted_Quantifiers|Return to Excercise]]




Line 49: Line 60:


[[NMTS-Group5#Different_types_of_Quantifiers|Return to Excercise]]
[[NMTS-Group5#Different_types_of_Quantifiers|Return to Excercise]]




Line 76: Line 97:


[[NMTS-Group5#Scopal_Ambiguity|Return to Excercise]]
[[NMTS-Group5#Scopal_Ambiguity|Return to Excercise]]




Line 99: Line 130:


[[NMTS-Group5#Restricted_Quantifiers|Return to Excercise]]
[[NMTS-Group5#Restricted_Quantifiers|Return to Excercise]]




Line 126: Line 167:


[[NMTS-Group5#Different_types_of_Quantifiers|Return to Excercise]]
[[NMTS-Group5#Different_types_of_Quantifiers|Return to Excercise]]




Line 149: Line 200:


[[NMTS-Group5#Different_types_of_Quantifiers|Return to Excercise]]
[[NMTS-Group5#Different_types_of_Quantifiers|Return to Excercise]]




Line 170: Line 231:


[[NMTS-Group5#Restricted_Quantifiers|Return to Excercise]]
[[NMTS-Group5#Restricted_Quantifiers|Return to Excercise]]




Line 193: Line 264:


[[NMTS-Group5#Different_types_of_Quantifiers|Return to Excercise]]
[[NMTS-Group5#Different_types_of_Quantifiers|Return to Excercise]]




Line 216: Line 297:


[[NMTS-Group5#Restricted_Quantifiers|Return to Excercise]]
[[NMTS-Group5#Restricted_Quantifiers|Return to Excercise]]




Line 245: Line 336:


[[NMTS-Group5#Scopal_Ambiguity|Return to Excercise]]
[[NMTS-Group5#Scopal_Ambiguity|Return to Excercise]]


== Placeholder ==
== Placeholder ==

Latest revision as of 11:42, 9 April 2013

On this page, you can find the solutions to the excercises on Quantifiers.


Restricted Quantifiers 1a

Sorry, this is not correct.

In restricted quantifier notation, the "complete" semantic representation of the noun phrase (NP) appears in the restrictor (-> square brackets).


Return to Excercise













Types Quantifiers 2d

Ramon signs every sculpture he makes.


2b) Universal Quantifier

∀x (SCULPTURE (x) & MAKE (r, x) → SIGN (r, x))

"For every thing x, if x is a sculpture and x is made by Ramon (r) then x is signed by Ramon (r)."


Since Ramon makes and signs the sculptures, the corresponding variables are (r, x).


2c) Restricted Quantifier

[Every x: SCULPTURE (x) & MAKE (r, x)] SIGN (r, x)

Here, the N' is "sculpture he makes" and therefore belongs in square brackets together with the Quantifier every.


Return to Excercise













Scopal Ambiguity 3a

In this sentence, the scopal ambiguity is created by the two quantifiers everyone and someone.

When looking at the two pictures that try to help you, you can see two possible readings:

1. For every person there is, there is at least one other person who loves him / her.

2. There is one person that is loved by everyone else.


Return to Excercise













Restricted Quantifiers 1c

Sorry, this is not correct.

In restricted quantifier notation, the semantic representation of the noun phrase (NP) appears in the restrictor.


Return to Excercise













Types Quantifiers 2a

Sorry, this is not correct.

Existential quantifiers are used for sentences that represent something that exists.

Of course, you could argue that there is a Person x such that x is called Ramon and x makes (and then signs) sculptures - but this is not what we were going for.

Maybe you want to check the possible answers once more.


Return to Excercise













Types Quantifiers 2b

Yes, this is correct.

Check if there is another correct answer!


Return to Excercise













Restricted Quantifiers 1b

Yes, this is correct.


Return to Excercise













Types Quantifiers 2c

Yes, this is correct.

Check if there is another correct answer!


Return to Excercise













Restricted Quantifiers 1d

Sorry, this is not correct.

In restricted quantifier notation, the semantic representation of the noun phrase (NP) appears in the restrictor.


Return to Excercise













Scopal Ambiguity 3b

1. For every person there is at least one person who loves him / her:

∀x (PERSON (x) → ∃y (PERSON (y) & LOVE (x, y))


2. There is one person that is loved by everyone:

∃x (PERSON (x) → ∀y (PERSON (y) & LOVE (y, x))


Return to Excercise








Placeholder

This is just a placeholder in order to make sure the links work correctly, independently of the size of the PC-screen.























This is just a placeholder in order to make sure the links work correctly, independently of the size of the PC-screen.