User:MMuth: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Task 1''' | |||
[[File:I hit the fly with the newspaper.png|thumb]] | |||
<quiz display=simple> | |||
{Question What is the correct reading for the syntax tree? | |||
|type="()"} | |||
- Reading 1: I used a newspaper to hit the fly. | |||
|| This reading would be correct if, in the syntax tree, the PP would modify the VP. | |||
+ Reading 2: The fly with the newspaper is what I hit. | |||
</quiz> | |||
=Term paper: L3, FW 2.1, WiSe 20/21= | =Term paper: L3, FW 2.1, WiSe 20/21= | ||
Revision as of 19:18, 11 May 2021
Task 1
Term paper: L3, FW 2.1, WiSe 20/21
Examples
After having watched the video, work on the following tasks.
Task 1 Identify the determiners in the following sentence.
(a) Juliet talked to some stranger at the party.
(b) Every Capulet is an enemy to some Montague.
(c) Many people in Verona are not happy about the Capulet-Montague feud.
Check your solutions here:
(a) some
(b) every, some
(c) many
Task 2 Identify the formula that corresponds to the translation of the sentence.
Task 3 The sentence: Some Tybalt loved some Montague. is translated into the formula
∃ y (montague1(y) : love2(tybalt,y).
Given this table, is the overall formula true or false? (Give a reason for your answer.)
Check your solutions here:
The formula is false, because there is no individual in our model for which both the restrictor and the scope are true.
Feel free to send feedback on this exercise to Manfred Sailer.