Exercise General definition of ambiguity: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
- a polysemous word | - a polysemous word | ||
|| Polysemous means that a sound sequence has two or more different, but '''semantically related''' meanings. <br/> | || Polysemous means that a sound sequence has two or more different, but '''semantically related''' meanings. <br/> | ||
|| e.g., the word '''man''' is polysemous: | || e.g., the word '''man''' is polysemous: a human being (vs. animal), a male human being (vs. female), an adult male human being (vs. boy) | ||
|| See the Glossary entry on [[Glossary:Polysemy|Polysemy]] for more information. <br/> | || See the Glossary entry on [[Glossary:Polysemy|Polysemy]] for more information. <br/> | ||
+ a homophone word | + a homophone word | ||
|| A homophone is a form that has two or more distinct meanings, but is pronounced in the same way. <br/> | || A homophone is a form that has two or more distinct meanings, but is pronounced in the same way. <br/> | ||
|| e.g., the word '''bank''' is ambigous: a financial institute, the side of a river | || e.g., the word '''bank''' is ambigous: a financial institute, the side of a river | ||
| Line 24: | Line 22: | ||
|type="()" } | |type="()" } | ||
- scope ambiguity | - scope ambiguity | ||
|| Scope ambiguity deals with the scope of quantifiers (''every'', ''some'' ...) and leads to structurally distinct logical forms. | |||
|| Scope ambiguity deals with the scope of quantifiers (every, some ...) and | || e.g.''Everyone loves someone.' The sentence can be read in the two following ways. <br/> | ||
|| e.g. | || Reading 1: ''Everyone loves the same someone.''; Reading 2: ''Everyone loves some different person.'' | ||
|| | |||
|| See the Glossary entry on [[Glossary:Scope Ambiguity| Scope Ambiguity]] for more information. <br/> | || See the Glossary entry on [[Glossary:Scope Ambiguity| Scope Ambiguity]] for more information. <br/> | ||
+ lexical ambiguity | + lexical ambiguity | ||
|| | || This correct. Lexical ambiguity means that the ambiguity arises on the level of the lexeme (word). | ||
|| e.g. ''I was right next to the '''bank''' when I fainted, otherwise I might not have survived.'' | |||
|| e.g. | || The speaker might have fainted on the water next to the bank of a river, so he did not drown. | ||
|| The speaker fainted next to a financial institute, so enough people were there who could help him. | |||
|| | |||
|| | |||
|| See the Glossary entry on [[Glossary:Lexical_Ambiguity|Lexical Ambiguity]] for more information. <br/> | || See the Glossary entry on [[Glossary:Lexical_Ambiguity|Lexical Ambiguity]] for more information. <br/> | ||
- structural ambiguity | - structural ambiguity | ||
|| Structural ambiguity deals with ambiguity on the level of syntax. | || Structural ambiguity deals with ambiguity on the level of syntax. | ||
|| e.g. | || e.g. ''old women and men'': It is unclear to which noun (women and/or men) the adjective old refers, | ||
|| so the sentence could be read in the two following ways: (i) Both women and men are old. (ii) only the women are said to be old. | |||
|| See the Glossary entry on [[Glossary:Structural Ambiguity| Structural Ambiguity]] for more information. <br/> | || See the Glossary entry on [[Glossary:Structural Ambiguity| Structural Ambiguity]] for more information. <br/> | ||
| Line 62: | Line 50: | ||
|| *Bank as financial institution: "There is no financial institution in this town." | || *Bank as financial institution: "There is no financial institution in this town." | ||
</quiz> | |||
'''4.''' Think of three sentences in which the word “hot” has different meanings. | |||
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="width:800px"> | |||
Check your solution here | |||
<div class="mw-collapsible-content"> | |||
The Oxford dictionary proposes the following six different solutions (according to the dictionary you used other solutions might be possible: | |||
* This girl is really hot. -> hot = good looking | |||
* This pepper is really hot. -> hot = extremely spicy | |||
* This soup is really hot. -> hot = warm | |||
* That was a really hot debate -> hot = involving much activity | |||
* Marc is very hot on Hifi. -> hot = very knowledgable, interested in | |||
* The whole situation was too hot to be handled by us alone -> hot = difficult to deal with | |||
If you want to check if a word has different meanings you can consult a dictionary. A good address is http://oxforddictionaries.com <br/> | |||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
</ | <br/> | ||
<br/> | |||
==== Navigation ==== | ==== Navigation ==== | ||
Latest revision as of 20:28, 6 January 2014
The following material is an adapted form of material created by student participants of the project e-Learning Resources for Semantics (e-LRS).
Involved participants: Nicki, Marc M, Leo, Anna Böcher, Lorena
General definition of ambiguity
4. Think of three sentences in which the word “hot” has different meanings.
Check your solution here
The Oxford dictionary proposes the following six different solutions (according to the dictionary you used other solutions might be possible:
- This girl is really hot. -> hot = good looking
- This pepper is really hot. -> hot = extremely spicy
- This soup is really hot. -> hot = warm
- That was a really hot debate -> hot = involving much activity
- Marc is very hot on Hifi. -> hot = very knowledgable, interested in
- The whole situation was too hot to be handled by us alone -> hot = difficult to deal with
If you want to check if a word has different meanings you can consult a dictionary. A good address is http://oxforddictionaries.com