Exercise Implicatures: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
---+ Mom: What did you think of Junior’s childish behavior last night? Dad: Well, boys will be boys | ---+ Mom: What did you think of Junior’s childish behavior last night? Dad: Well, boys will be boys | ||
|| The father's reply is seemingly unrelated to the question. | || The father's reply is seemingly unrelated to the question. | ||
+-- | -+-- Student A: Do you like Linguistics? Student B: Well, let’s just say I don’t jump for joy before class. | ||
|| | || The reply is inadequately lengthy. | ||
-+ | --+- Student: I was absent on Monday - did I miss anything important? Teacher: Oh no, of course not, we never do anything important in class. | ||
|| | || The teacher says something she (hopefully!) does not believe to be true. | ||
+--- Student A: Did you read the paper for today's class? Student B: | |||
+--- Student A: Did you read the paper | </quiz> | ||
The youtube video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oI9tFOcVnV4 contains short clips with examples of violations of the four maxims. | |||
Revision as of 21:53, 13 November 2013
The following material is an adapted form of material created by student participants of the project e-Learning Resources for Semantics (e-LRS).
Involved participants: Stephanie C., Stephie R., Jenny, Anna P.
Implicatures
Grice's Conversational Maxims
According to Grice's theory of conversational implicature, there are four basic maxims which specify how to be cooperative in conversation: Quantity, Manner, Quality and Relation. Grice believed that implicatures arise when these maxims are violated and the speaker (relying on an assumption of cooperation) is forced to infer meaning.
The youtube video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oI9tFOcVnV4 contains short clips with examples of violations of the four maxims.