Exercise Syntax of Predicate Logic

From Lexical Resource Semantics
Revision as of 18:08, 5 April 2013 by Manfred (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Formulae without variables

For the following exercises we use names and properties from the The Lord of the Rings novels.

Names: frodo, sam, gandalf, aragorn
1-place predicates: hobbit, wizard
2-place predicates: know, help

1 Click on the items that are well-formed expressions of the semantic representation language.

gandalf
hobbit
sauron
frodogandalf
know(gandalf)
help(aragorn,frodo)

2 Click on the expressions that are well-formed formulae.

hobbit
frodo
hobbit(aragorn)
hobbit(frodo) ∧ wizard(gandalf)
hobbit(frodo) ¬ wizard(sam)



The following material is an adapted form of material created by student participants of the project e-Learning Resources for Semantics (e-LRS).
Involved participants: Lisa, Marthe, Elisabeth, and Isabelle.


2. a) Which of the following expressions of predicate logic are formulae? Give an explanation for your decision. If the expression is not a formula try to change it into one. To check your answers click on single expressions.


* family dog

* blonde(Alice,Paul)

* father-of-someone(Alice,Lisa)

* tall(Alice)

* enjoy-watching-football-together


For a general explanation of formulae Click here


Formulae with variables

For the following exercises we use names and properties from the The Lord of the Rings novels.

Names: frodo, sam, gandalf, aragorn
1-place predicates: hobbit, wizard
2-place predicates: know, help

1 Click on the items that are well-formed expressions of the semantic representation language.

y
xfrodo
x

2 Click on the expressions that are well-formed formulae.

x (hobbit(x) ⊃ x = gandalf)
y(hobbit(x) ∨ wizard(gandalf))



Back to