Glossary:Scope Ambiguity: Difference between revisions

From Lexical Resource Semantics
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{MaterialUnderConstruction}} =Structural Ambiguity= /strʌktʃɘrɘl æmbigjʊɘti/ ==Definition== Structural ambiguity arises if two or more different syntactic structur...")
 
 
(19 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{MaterialUnderConstruction}}
{{MaterialUnderConstruction}}


=Structural Ambiguity=
{{CreatedByStudents1213}}<br />Involved participants: [[User:Nicki| Nicki]], [[User:Marc_M| Marc M]], [[User:Leo| Leo]], [[User:Anna_Böcher| Anna Böcher]], [[User:Lorena| Lorena]]


/strʌktʃɘrɘl æmbigjʊɘti/
=Scope Ambiguity=
 
/skəʊp æmbigjʊɘti/


==Definition==
==Definition==
Scope ambiguities arise when the scope (scope: an area over which activity, capacity, or influence extends) of a part - or parts - of a sentence is unclear. Quantifiers (words like ''every''), negations and adverbial or adjectival modifiers often give rise to scope ambiguites.


Structural ambiguity arises if two or more different syntactic structures can be assigned to one phrase. In other words: One word order can be associated with two or more different meanings.
A sentence with a scope ambiguity need not be structurally ambiguous.


==Examples==
==Examples==
1. ''Every man loves a woman.''


There are a lot of old men and women around.
Reading 1: For every man there is some woman that he loves <br/>
 
Reading 2: Every man loves the same woman <br/>
Reading 1: There are a lot of men and women around who are all old. <br/>
-> The different meanings are determined by which quantifier is given the widest scope. By giving 'every' the widest scope, reading 1 arises; by giving 'a' the widest scope, reading 2 arises.
Reading 2: There are a lot of old men and women of any age around.  


We need more intelligent administrators
2. ''All that glitters is not gold.''


Reading 1: We need a larger number of intelligent administrators. <br/>
Reading 1: Everything that glitters is not made of gold; Conclusion: This rock glitters so it cannot be gold <br/>
Reading 2: We need more administrators who are intelligent.
Reading 2: Not everything that glitters is gold; Conclusion: This rock glitters so it might be gold but it does not have to be. <br/>
-> The different meanings are determined by the scope of the word not. By giving it a narrow scope ('not' only applies to ' gold'), reading 1 arises; by giving it a broad scope ('not' applies to 'All that glitters is gold'), reading 2 arises.


==Related terms==
==Related terms==
*'''[[Glossary:Lexical Ambiguity|Lexical Ambiguity]]'''
*'''[[Glossary:Lexical Ambiguity|Lexical Ambiguity]]'''
*'''[[Glossary:Ambiguity|Ambiguity]]'''
*'''[[Glossary:Ambiguity|Ambiguity]]'''
*'''[[Glossary:Structural Ambiguity|Structural Ambiguity]]'''


==References==
==References==
*Bieswanger, Markus/Becker, Annette (2008): Introduction to English Linguistics. 2te aktual. Aufl. A Francke Verlag, Tübingen und Basel., p. 155/156.
*Bieswanger, Markus/Becker, Annette (2008): Introduction to English Linguistics. 2te aktual. Aufl. A Francke Verlag, Tübingen und Basel., p. 155/156.
*[http://www2.let.uu.nl/Uil-OTS/Lexicon/|Structural Ambiguity in Utrecht University, Lexicon of Linguistics]
*[http://www2.let.uu.nl/Uil-OTS/Lexicon/|Structural Ambiguity in Utrecht University, Lexicon of Linguistics]
*[http://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/scope| Thesaurus entry on 'scope']
*[http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/projects/milca/courses/comsem/html/node92.html| http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/projects/milca/courses/comsem/html/node92.html]
*[http://www.fallacyfiles.org/scopefal.html| http://www.fallacyfiles.org/scopefal.html]

Latest revision as of 16:30, 11 April 2013

Warning:
The material on this page has been created as part of a seminar. It is still heavily under construction and we do not guarantee its correctness. If you have comments on this page or suggestions for improvement, please contact Manfred Sailer.
This note will be removed once the page has been carefully checked and integrated into the main part of this wiki.

The following material is an adapted form of material created by student participants of the project e-Learning Resources for Semantics (e-LRS).
Involved participants: Nicki, Marc M, Leo, Anna Böcher, Lorena

Scope Ambiguity

/skəʊp æmbigjʊɘti/

Definition

Scope ambiguities arise when the scope (scope: an area over which activity, capacity, or influence extends) of a part - or parts - of a sentence is unclear. Quantifiers (words like every), negations and adverbial or adjectival modifiers often give rise to scope ambiguites.

A sentence with a scope ambiguity need not be structurally ambiguous.

Examples

1. Every man loves a woman.

Reading 1: For every man there is some woman that he loves
Reading 2: Every man loves the same woman
-> The different meanings are determined by which quantifier is given the widest scope. By giving 'every' the widest scope, reading 1 arises; by giving 'a' the widest scope, reading 2 arises.

2. All that glitters is not gold.

Reading 1: Everything that glitters is not made of gold; Conclusion: This rock glitters so it cannot be gold
Reading 2: Not everything that glitters is gold; Conclusion: This rock glitters so it might be gold but it does not have to be.
-> The different meanings are determined by the scope of the word not. By giving it a narrow scope ('not' only applies to ' gold'), reading 1 arises; by giving it a broad scope ('not' applies to 'All that glitters is gold'), reading 2 arises.

Related terms

References