My dog Richard: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Entailment!!! The reason why we have an entailment here is the fact that we have can think of a second sentence that indicates the truth of the sentence you just read. My dog...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
My dog Richard was killed in a car accident (A) | My dog Richard was killed in a car accident (A) | ||
(entails) My dog is dead (B) | (entails) My dog is dead (B) | ||
The consequence of A is B. In order to find out whether you deal with an entailment or a presupposition you may negate the sentence A. If sentence B remains true then you are confronted with a presupposition, if not you most certainly deal with an entailment: | The consequence of A is B. In order to find out whether you deal with an entailment or a presupposition you may negate the sentence A. If sentence B remains true then you are confronted with a presupposition, if not you most certainly deal with an entailment: | ||
My dog Richard was not killed in a car accident (A) | My dog Richard was not killed in a car accident (A) | ||
My dog is dead (B)= WRONG!!!!=> Entailment | My dog is dead (B)= WRONG!!!!=> Entailment | ||
<hr /> | |||
Back to the [[NMTS-Group3|NMTS-Group3]]. | |||
Latest revision as of 13:39, 21 January 2013
Entailment!!! The reason why we have an entailment here is the fact that we have can think of a second sentence that indicates the truth of the sentence you just read.
My dog Richard was killed in a car accident (A) (entails) My dog is dead (B)
The consequence of A is B. In order to find out whether you deal with an entailment or a presupposition you may negate the sentence A. If sentence B remains true then you are confronted with a presupposition, if not you most certainly deal with an entailment:
My dog Richard was not killed in a car accident (A) My dog is dead (B)= WRONG!!!!=> Entailment
Back to the NMTS-Group3.