WiSe22/23: Constraint-based Semantics 2: Difference between revisions

From Lexical Resource Semantics
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 61: Line 61:


= Modality =
= Modality =
We assume:
* Our model contains a set of possible worlds ''W'', and a set of accessiblity relations "ACC" ("ACC" &in; "Pow"(W<sup>W</sup>), i.e. M = < "U", "I", "W" >
*

Revision as of 06:46, 9 November 2022

HPSG-neutral notation for LRS

Constraints

Metavariables: α, β, ɣ, ..., φ, ψ, ...

Contribution constraints:

  • call(x)
    The semantic representation of a sign with a contribution constraint of the form call(x) must be an expression containing call(x) as a subexpression
  • ¬α
    The semantic representation of a sign with a contribution constraint of the form ¬α must be an expression containing ¬α as a subexpression where α can be any expression.

Embedding constraints:

  • α[call(x)]
    The metavariable α is any expression containing call(x) as a subexpression.

Combinatorial semantics

When two signs combine,

  1. all constraints on the combining signs' semantic representation also apply to the resulting combination, and
  2. additional constraints may be added through principles of grammar.

Internal content

internal content: The scopally lowest contributed element, marked in curly brackets: {φ}

  • call: {call(x)}
  • everyone: ∀x({person(x)} : β[x])

External content

external content: The semantic representation of a complete sign, marked by underlining: φ

  • everyone: ∀x({person(x)} : β[x])

Combinatorially added constraints

Internal content raisers

When an auxiliary combines with its VP complement, the internal content of the complement must be the internal content of the auxiliary.

Example:

  • call: {call(x)}
  • didn't: ¬α[{α'}]
  • didn't call: β[call(x), ¬α[{α'}, α'≡call(x) ]
    This constraint can be expressed more compactly as: β[¬α[{call(x)}]]

Determiner-noun combinations

When a determiner combines with a head, the head's internal content is a subexpression of the determiner's restrictor.

Example:

  • book: {book(x)}
  • every: {∀}x(φ[x] : ψ[x])
  • every book: α[{book(x)}, {∀}x(φ[x] : ψ[x]), φ[book(x)]
    This constraint can be expressed more compactly as: α[{∀}x(φ[x, {book(x)}] : ψ[x])]

Quantified NPs as non-heads

When a quantified NP combines with a head, the head's internal content is a subexpression of the quantifier's restrictor.

Example:

  • called: {call(x)}
  • someone: ∃x({person(x)} : ψ[x])
  • Someone called.: α[{call(x)}, ∃x({person(x)} : ψ[x]), ψ[call(x)]]
    This constraint can be expressed more compactly as: α[∃x({person(x)} : ψ[x,{call(x)}])]

External content principle

The semantic representation of an utterance

  1. can only contain the constants, variables, and operators that occur in the constraints contributed by lexical items and
  2. it must respect all constraints contributed by the lexical and non-lexical items contained in the utterance

Modality

We assume:

  • Our model contains a set of possible worlds W, and a set of accessiblity relations "ACC" ("ACC" ∈ "Pow"(WW), i.e. M = < "U", "I", "W" >