Wiki-ch2: Difference between revisions

From Lexical Resource Semantics
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 13: Line 13:
* Universe: ''U'' = {''LittleRedRidingHood'', ''Grandmother'', ''Wolf''}<br />
* Universe: ''U'' = {''LittleRedRidingHood'', ''Grandmother'', ''Wolf''}<br />
* Properties: <br />''red-hood'' = { < ''x''> | ''x'' wears a read hood } = { <''LittleRedRidingHood''> }<br />''female'' = { <''x''> | ''x'' is female } = { <''LittleRedRidingHood''>, <''Grandmother''> }<br />''big-mouth'' = { <''x''> | ''x'' has a big mouth } = { <''Wolf''> }<br />
* Properties: <br />''red-hood'' = { < ''x''> | ''x'' wears a read hood } = { <''LittleRedRidingHood''> }<br />''female'' = { <''x''> | ''x'' is female } = { <''LittleRedRidingHood''>, <''Grandmother''> }<br />''big-mouth'' = { <''x''> | ''x'' has a big mouth } = { <''Wolf''> }<br />
* Relation: ''grand-child-of'' = { <''x'',''y''> | ''x'' is ''y'' 's grandchild }
* Relation: ''grand-child-of'' = { <''x'',''y''> | ''x'' is ''y'' 's grandchild } = { <''LittleRedRidingHood'',''Grandmother'' > }


== Truth tables ==
== Truth tables ==

Revision as of 14:02, 1 September 2013

Additional Wiki pages for Chapter 2

Models

The following material is an adapted form of material created by student participants of the project e-Learning Resources for Semantics (e-LRS). Involved participants: Lisa, Marthe, Elisabeth, Isabelle.

Watch a short podcast what first-order models look like.

<mediaplayer>http://youtu.be/4a3mXelw7H4</mediaplayer>

Based on this podcast, we can define a model as follows:

  • Universe: U = {LittleRedRidingHood, Grandmother, Wolf}
  • Properties:
    red-hood = { < x> | x wears a read hood } = { <LittleRedRidingHood> }
    female = { <x> | x is female } = { <LittleRedRidingHood>, <Grandmother> }
    big-mouth = { <x> | x has a big mouth } = { <Wolf> }
  • Relation: grand-child-of = { <x,y> | x is y 's grandchild } = { <LittleRedRidingHood,Grandmother > }

Truth tables

The following material is an adapted form of material created by student participants of the project e-Learning Resources for Semantics (e-LRS). Involved participants: Lisa, Marthe, Elisabeth, Isabelle.

Truth tables for connectives

AND (∧)

Symbol: ∧
Sentence: Harry is a student and Snape is a teacher.
Formulae: student(harry) ∧ teacher(snape)

A conjunction pq it true if and only if p is true and q is true.

Truthtable AND

Truthtable AND1.png

OR (∨)

Symbol: ∨
Sentence: Harry is a student or Snape is a teacher.
Formulae: student(harry) ∨ teacher(snape)

A disjunction pq is true if and only if p is true or q is true (or both).

Truthtable OR

Truthtable OR1.png

IF/THEN (⊃, →)

Symbol: ⊃, → (Note: We use the symbol ⊃ in the textbook as it is more common in the logical literature.)
Sentence: If Harry is a student then Snape is a teacher.
Formula: student(harry) ⊃ teacher(snape)

An implication pq is true if and only if p is false or q is true (or both).
In other words: An implication pq is true if and only if whenever p is true, q is true as well.

Truthtable IF/THEN

Truthtable IF THEN2.png

NOT (¬)

Symbol: ¬
Sentence: Harry is not a student.
Formula: ¬student(harry)

A negated formula ¬p is true if and only if p is false.

Example: Only if student(harry) is false, ¬student(harry) is true.

Truthtable NOT

Truthtable NOT.png

Truth tables for complex formulae

Truth tables are also useful to compute the truth value of complex formulae. This is shown in the following podcast, created by Lisa Günthner.

<mediaplayer>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWdltj5Mqdc</mediaplayer>


Links

There are short lectures by Jürgen Hanke (Virtual Linguistics Campus) related to the topics of Chapter 2:

  • Predicates and their arguments
  • Logical connectives
  • Quantifiers ("∀" and "∃")
    • Note: The video mentions the terms "restrictor" and "scope" of a quantifier but uses the conventional first-order representation of quantifiers. This means that the restrictor and the scope are linked by an implication ("&sup") in the case of a universal quantifier and by a conjunction ("∧") in the case of the existential quantifier.
      So, where we write: ∀ x (φ : ψ), the traditional notation is: ∀ x (φ ⊃ ψ),
      and where we write ∃ x (φ : ψ), the traditional notation is ∃ x (φ ∧ ψ)
    • Note: In the video, the symbol "¬" is called "the negative quantifier". This is to be seen as short hand for "¬∃"

Back to